2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-010-9195-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area. Part II: analysis of Joint Urban 2003 wind-tunnel measurements

Abstract: An analysis of concentration time series measured in a boundary-layer wind tunnel at the University of Hamburg is presented. The measurements were conducted with a detailed aerodynamic model of the Oklahoma City (OKC) central business district (CBD) at the scale of 1:300 and were part of the Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) project. Concentration statistics, as well as concentration probability density (PDF) and exceedance probability (EDF) functions were computed for street-and roof-level sites for three different w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 7.6 % of non-stationary cases were predominantly found at plume boundaries where meandering of the plume and large scale vertical fluctuations create significant concentration fluctuations at relatively large temporal scales that can result in non-stationary signals unless the averaging time is suitably extended. This is compatible with the observations reported in full scale experiments [5] and in other wind tunnel experiments [10] that illustrate how the high intermittency observed at the edge of dispersing urban plumes can lead to difficulties in achieving representative statistics for concentration fluctuations, especially in full scale experiments.…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 7.6 % of non-stationary cases were predominantly found at plume boundaries where meandering of the plume and large scale vertical fluctuations create significant concentration fluctuations at relatively large temporal scales that can result in non-stationary signals unless the averaging time is suitably extended. This is compatible with the observations reported in full scale experiments [5] and in other wind tunnel experiments [10] that illustrate how the high intermittency observed at the edge of dispersing urban plumes can lead to difficulties in achieving representative statistics for concentration fluctuations, especially in full scale experiments.…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This means that concentration fluctuations in developing plumes is a topic that needs to be understood in detail and then modelled. Analysis of the fluctuating concentration field has been based on full scale experiments [3][4][5], small scale models in wind tunnels [6][7][8][9][10] and in water channels [11,12]. Models have been developed to evaluate the intensity of fluctuations and the statistics of exceeding specific concentration thresholds [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties depend strongly on the local geometry and existing models generally relate them to the mean building height (H b ) and the lambda parameters (λ p , and λ f , see above). Recent studies (Carpentieri et al 2009(Carpentieri et al , 2012aCarpentieri and Robins, 2010;Harms et al, 2011;Klein et al, 2011), however, have highlighted the complexity of the flow and dispersion fields in actual urban geometries (as opposed to idealised building arrangements). It is clear from such studies that more parameters (such as building height variability and building aspect ratio) should be taken into account for a more accurate prediction of flow and dispersion in actual urban canopies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yee et al (2006) provided detailed comparisons of concentration statistics in a plume dispersing through the MUST obstacle array at three different scales; namely, at fullscale in a field experiment, at 1:50 scale in a wind-tunnel simulation, and at 1:205 scale in a water-channel simulation. Finally, Klein et al (2008) analyzed and compared concentration fluctuation measurements from the Joint Urban 2003 full-scale and wind-tunnel experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%