2019
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2018.2866743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration Measurement of Microliter-Volume Water–Glucose Solutions Using $Q$ Factor of Microwave Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dielectric Constant Frequency Range (GHz) Resonant Frequency Shift (MHz) [19] 66 for 10% methanol and 77 for the 10% ethanol 4-5 35 for methanol and 30 for ethanol [20] 39 for 40% ethanol 1.3-2.3 40 [21] 58 for methanol 40% and 57 for 40% ethanol 1.7-2.1 30 for methanol and 15 for ethanol [25] 55 for 30% ethanol 1-3 90 [26] 57 for 40% methanol and 53 for 40% ethanol 0.8-2.2 20 for methanol and 30 for ethanol [27] 76.84 for water, 6.62 for ethanol and 20.54 for methanol 2, 5, and 7 8 for water, 2 for methanol, 3 for ethanol [28] 59 for 40% ethanol 0.8-0.95 10 This work 77.5 for water, 57 for 40% methanol and 56 for 40% Ethanol 2.5-3.5 100 for water, 90 for methanol, and 80 for ethanol Table 2. Comparison of sensitivity for the rest chemical samples between our proposed structure and other in literature.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dielectric Constant Frequency Range (GHz) Resonant Frequency Shift (MHz) [19] 66 for 10% methanol and 77 for the 10% ethanol 4-5 35 for methanol and 30 for ethanol [20] 39 for 40% ethanol 1.3-2.3 40 [21] 58 for methanol 40% and 57 for 40% ethanol 1.7-2.1 30 for methanol and 15 for ethanol [25] 55 for 30% ethanol 1-3 90 [26] 57 for 40% methanol and 53 for 40% ethanol 0.8-2.2 20 for methanol and 30 for ethanol [27] 76.84 for water, 6.62 for ethanol and 20.54 for methanol 2, 5, and 7 8 for water, 2 for methanol, 3 for ethanol [28] 59 for 40% ethanol 0.8-0.95 10 This work 77.5 for water, 57 for 40% methanol and 56 for 40% Ethanol 2.5-3.5 100 for water, 90 for methanol, and 80 for ethanol Table 2. Comparison of sensitivity for the rest chemical samples between our proposed structure and other in literature.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proposed structure was fabricated and measured using water/ethanol solutions for the confirmation of the sensing principle [26]. Besides, by utilizing the Q factor concept, a microwave sensor was studied for the detection of glucose concentration at the operating frequency of 2, 5, and 7 GHz [27]. In another study, dielectric liquids were characterized by using differential mode microwave microfluidic sensor based on frequency splitting and a microstrip splitter/combiner configuration and split ring resonators (SRRs) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the glucose concentration will cause a change in the dielectric properties of the tissue and thus impedance, and is the input into the sensor circuit. Sensors include microstrip patch antennas [177], spiral microstrip resonator [178,179], open-loop microstrip resonator [180][181][182], split-ring resonators [1,183,184], patch resonators [172] and dielectric resonator antennas [185]. These sensors have different principles of operation, but they are based on the same idea of measuring changes in glucose concentration by measuring the reflected changes in amplitude and resonant frequency of sensors' response.…”
Section: Millimeter Wave/microwave/ultra-high Frequency Wave Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These output measurements reflect changes in the glucose concentration that correlate to the dielectric properties of tissue [186]. The dependency of glucose concentration to the quality factor of an open-loop resonator was recently investigated by measuring the Q factor for different glucose concentration in aqueous solutions [180], blood plasma solutions [181] and on 352 human tongues [182]. The latter study resulted in reliable glucose measurements in some of the human subjects.…”
Section: Millimeter Wave/microwave/ultra-high Frequency Wave Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple patch resonators have been used that have not achieved enough sensitivity but the detection limit was good. In 16 , the work has focused mainly on the development of the sensors but the measurements were proof of concept and not actually done on diabetic patients or performed water-glucose solutions instead of blood glucose respectively. Our research group proposed an approach using bio-impedance measurements 17 and also done work on in-body radio channels for wireless implants 18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%