2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00304-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
192
3
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
10
192
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct comparability is impaired by the lack of traffic count data during the sampling periods in earlier studies, as well as by differences in monitor placement (e.g., a fourth-floor apartment in the semiurban location in Boston, versus roadside measurements in Roxbury). Ultrafine particle count concentrations in our study were somewhat higher than levels reported at sites in the Los Angeles basin (Kim et al, 2002) or at background urban sites in Australia (Hitchins et al, 2000), but were lower on average than near-road measurements in Australia or concentrations in other high-traffic settings in Boston (Levy et al, 2002). It is difficult to compare PM 2.5 concentrations with levels in other studies due to differences in instrumentation, but the mean concentration was higher than concentrations measured in other outdoor settings in Boston using the DustTrak (Levy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct comparability is impaired by the lack of traffic count data during the sampling periods in earlier studies, as well as by differences in monitor placement (e.g., a fourth-floor apartment in the semiurban location in Boston, versus roadside measurements in Roxbury). Ultrafine particle count concentrations in our study were somewhat higher than levels reported at sites in the Los Angeles basin (Kim et al, 2002) or at background urban sites in Australia (Hitchins et al, 2000), but were lower on average than near-road measurements in Australia or concentrations in other high-traffic settings in Boston (Levy et al, 2002). It is difficult to compare PM 2.5 concentrations with levels in other studies due to differences in instrumentation, but the mean concentration was higher than concentrations measured in other outdoor settings in Boston using the DustTrak (Levy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Urban PAH concentrations have also been linked with traffic volume, with minimal concentrations during low traffic and higher concentrations during rush hour (Levy et al, 2001). Ultrafine particle concentrations have been strongly correlated with traffic patterns, with particle number concentrations a factor of five greater at peak traffic periods than at night (Ruuskanen et al, 2001) and a factor of seven greater within 15 m of the road compared with average urban exposure levels (Hitchins et al, 2000). Particle number concentrations have also been related to wind speed and direction, with one study demonstrating decreasing concentrations at higher wind speeds (Zhu et al, 2002b) and a second finding an inverted U-shaped curve with lower concentrations at both high and low wind speeds (Zhu et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean number concentration of roadside ultrafine (10-100 nm) particles was low compared with that reported in many similar studies (Harrison et al, 1999;Hitchins et al, 2000;Hughes et al, 1998;Morawska et al, 1999;Ruellan and Cachier, 2001;Ruuskanen et al, 2001;Vakeva et al, 1999) (see Table 4, Paper I). Some possible explanations for this low value are that (1) there are no other nearby sources, e.g.…”
Section: Roadside Traffic Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The mean weekday traffic density on the E6 at the time of the study was about 45,700 vehicles per day (Gothenburg Traffic Office, 2006), but this did not influence the sampled concentrations. It has been shown that with increasing distance, ultrafine particles rapidly decrease in particle number concentration and change in particle size distribution (Hitchins et al, 2000;Zhu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Roadside Traffic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting weighted AADT values for all streets within the buffer were then summed for each subject. The "96% decay within 500 ft" criterion was selected because previous studies indicated substantial dispersion of motor vehicle exhaust pollutants within approximately this distance from roadways, although exact dispersion distances varied by study and pollutant measured (Hitchins et al 2000;Kuhler et al 1988;Nitta et al 1993;Ott 1977;Rodes and Holland 1981;Roorda-Knape et al 1998;Sistla et al 1979;Sivacoumar and Thanasekaran 1999;Wrobel et al 2000;Zhu et al 2002). We assigned a default DWTD value of 50 to 1,344 mapped homes (3%) with only small, uncounted local roads within the 750-ft buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%