With conventional cigarettes, the
burning cone reaches temperatures
of >900 °C, resulting in the production of numerous toxicants
and significant levels of highly reactive free radicals. In attempts
to eliminate combustion while still delivering nicotine and flavorings,
a newer alternative tobacco product has emerged known as “heat-not-burn”
(HnB). These products heat tobacco to temperatures of 250–350
°C depending on the device allowing for the volatilization of
nicotine and flavorants while potentially limiting the production
of combustion-related toxicants. To better understand how the designs
of these new products compare to conventional cigarettes and different
styles of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs), we measured and partially
characterized their production of free radicals. Smoke or aerosols
were trapped by a spin trap phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) and analyzed for free radicals using electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Free radical polarity was assessed by
passing the aerosol or smoke through either a polar or nonpolar trap
prior to being spin trapped with PBN. Particulate-phase radicals were
detected only for conventional cigarettes. Gas-phase free radicals
were detected in smoke/aerosol from all products with levels for HnB
(IQOS, Glo) (12 pmol/puff) being similar to e-cigs (Juul, SREC, box
mod e-cig) and hybrid devices (Ploom) (5–40 pmol/puff) but
50-fold lower than conventional cigarettes (1R6F). Gas phase radicals
differed in polarity with HnB products and conventional cigarettes
producing more polar radicals compared to those produced from e-cigs.
Free radical production should be considered in evaluating the toxicological
profile of nicotine delivery products and identification of the radicals
is of paramount importance.