1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00233.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptions of Ability and Intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These different patterns also emerged during adolescence, when beliefs about intelligence appear to crystallize and become more coherent (see, e.g., Dweck, 2002; Nicholls & Miller, 1983; Nicholls, Patashnick, & Mettetal, 1986; Pomerantz & Ruble, 1997). As these conceptions of intelligence develop, they may begin to form a constellation with students' goals, beliefs about effort, attributions, and responses to challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different patterns also emerged during adolescence, when beliefs about intelligence appear to crystallize and become more coherent (see, e.g., Dweck, 2002; Nicholls & Miller, 1983; Nicholls, Patashnick, & Mettetal, 1986; Pomerantz & Ruble, 1997). As these conceptions of intelligence develop, they may begin to form a constellation with students' goals, beliefs about effort, attributions, and responses to challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience with Logo did not seem to alter children's conceptions of the role and nature of errors or to bring about other notable epistemological changes. Rather, children appeared to associate intelligence with knowing answers (Nicholls, Patashnick, & Mettetal, 1986), a position that left little room for viewing mistakes with equanimity. Similarly, children evaluated all forms of computer-assisted instruction very positively without according privileged status to any particular combination of methods and software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicholls found limitations in the traditions of both personality and social psychology. He began his studies of achievement motivation by challenging social psychologists' preference for attribution theory (e.g., Nicholls, 1975, 1976a, 1978, 1979, 1980; Nicholls & Miller, 1983, 1984, 1985; Nicholls, Patashnick, & Mettetal, 1986). Specifically, Nicholls and his colleagues conducted a series of developmental studies that collectively revealed the fact that attributions like ability, effort, task difficulty, luck, and skill are not easily understood by children and are unlikely to mean the same things to everyone.…”
Section: Confounds In Educational Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%