Conceptions of learning research: Variations amongst French and Swedish nurses. A phenomenographic study

Dupin, Cécile Marie; Larsson, Maria; Dariel, Odessa Petit dit; Debout, Christophe; Rothan-Tondeur, Monique

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.003

Cited by 10 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Five studies used a combination of questionnaire and qualitative methods: Gerrish et al (2011); Jansen and Hoeijmakers (2013); Janssen et al (2015), King et al (2015) and Rickard et al (2011). Six studies used a face-to-face interview only: Bedoee (2011); Dupin et al (2015); Evans et al (2013); Finch et al (2015); Gonzalez et al (2012) and Murray and Newton (2009). The sample sizes in the reviewed studies ranged from six to 40 in the qualitative studies and from six to 855 in the studies based on quantitative methodology.…”

Section: Summary Of the Reviewed Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The term "practitioner" describes the health professional implementing care, such as nurses, medical staff or allied health professionals. This theme received the Bedoee, 2011;Behar-Horenstein and Johnson 2010;Dupin et al 2015;Evans et al, 2013;Finch et al, 2013Finch et al, , 2015Gonzalez et al, 2012;Hauck et al, 2015;Jansen and Hoeijmakers, 2013;Janssen et al, 2015;Metcalf et al, 2010;Pager et al, 2012;Rickard et al. 2011;Stephens et al, 2009;Ulrich et al, 2015.…”

Section: Practitionersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Behar-Horenstein and Johnson, 2010; Dupin et al, 2015;Evans et al, 2013;Gerrish et al, 2011;Janssen et al, 2015;King et al, 2015;Koivula et al, 2011;Rickard et al, 2011;Ulrich et al, 2015. Mentoring 8 Bedoee, 2011;Behar-Horenstein and Johnson, 2010;Evans et al. 2013;Finch et al, 2015: King et al, 2015Probst et al, 2015;Rickard et al, 2011;Ulrich et al, 2015.…”

Section: Qualification and Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Support 14 Bedoee, 2011;Dupin et al 2015;Evans et al, 2013;Finch et al, 2013Finch et al, , 2015Gerrish et al, 2011;Gonzalez et al, 2012;Hauck et al, 2015;Jansen and Hoeijmakers, 2013;King et al, 2015;Metcalf et al, 2010;Pager et al, 2012;Probst et al, 2015;Rickard et al, 2011. Feedback 3 Bedoee, 2011Hauck et al, 2015;King et al, 2015.…”

Section: Qualification and Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Educational institutions 5 Bedoee, 2011;Behar-Horenstein and Johnson 2010;Dupin et al 2015;Metcalf et al, 2010;Ulrich et al, 2015.…”

Section: Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Challenges and facilitators for health practitioners and academics engaging in collaborative research and publication: A systematic review / Herausforderungen und Förderfaktoren für gemeinsame Forschung und wissenschaftliche Publikation von Angehörigen verschiedener Gesundheitsberufe aus Praxis und Forschung: ein systematischer Review

King

Zlatanovic

Gillham

2018

International Journal of Health Professions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction While academics are frequently engaged in research activities and subsequent dissemination of results through publication, all too often they occur without health practitioner involvement. While there are contemporary expectations that health practitioners will be active contributors to their discipline’s body of knowledge, many find it difficult to prioritise research involvement given the demands of direct patient care. With this awareness as a central focus, we undertook a literature review to identify the challenges and facilitators that impact on health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research and publishing their findings in peer-reviewed journals. Methods A configurative systematic review was performed with six electronic databases (Proquest, CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, ERIC, SocINDEX) searched for studies from the disciplines of nursing, social work, allied health professions, health management, psychology and sociology. Manual searches were also undertaken to minimise the risk of missed studies. A rigorous search and retrieval process identified 20 relevant studies for inclusion in the review. The studies were first critically appraised then summarised. These steps were followed by thematic synthesis of the findings of the reviewed studies. Results Challenges and facilitators to health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research activities were found to be related to the interplay between practitioners, academics, educational and health institutions and professional demands. The interplay of these factors emerged as complex. Conclusion Strategies have been recommended that may encourage active partnerships between institutions, health practitioners and academics enabling greater research collaborations and subsequent increased publication of their combined achievements.

show abstract