Conceptions of national identity and opposition to bicultural policies in New Zealand: A comparison of majority and minority perspectives

Devos, Thierry; Yogeeswaran, Kumar; Milojev, Petar; Sibley, Chris G.

doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.004

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering that DCEP is used to promote the globalization of China's economy, it is clear that DCEP is a typical iconic national product. National identity has been considered in a wide range of research contexts, including national identity in the United States 48 , 49 , national identity in New Zealand 50 , national identity in Singapore 51 and national identity in postcolonial destinations 52 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China

Shin

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The introduction of digital currency electronic payment (DCEP) by the Central Bank of China is conducive to the central bank's timely grasp of macroeconomic dynamics and the internationalization of RMB. As DCEP is one of the first digital currencies issued by the central bank to be used on a large scale internationally, it is necessary to conduct research on its user adoption. Therefore, this research extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explore factors affecting the adoption of DCEP. The researchers cooperated with city banks that have started to use DCEP, and distributed questionnaires to users in the lobbies of these banks. A total of 295 valid questionnaires were empirically examined with Smart-PLS. The results indicate that perceived fairness, habits, social influence and national identity have significant effects on usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to be a significant moderator of the relationships between perceived fairness, habit, perceived risk and usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to have no moderating effect between social influence and usage, with a p value greater than 0.05. This research provides the central bank and the government with suggestions to increase user enthusiasm and reduce user perceived risks, thereby promoting the widespread use of DCEP.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China

Shin

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Beyond identifying subgroups of individuals, and as a matter of construct validity (Osborne & Sibley, 2017), we further examine whether these expected subgroups are meaningfully distinct from one another in their attitudes toward two social issues that have been typically considered in research on feelings of territorial ownership, and which are both relevant in the context of New Zealand: attitudes toward compensation for Indigenous Peoples NOOITGEDAGT ET AL. (Devos et al, 2020;Nooitgedagt, Figueiredo et al, 2021) and attitudes toward immigration (Johnston et al, 2010;Nijs, Martinović & Verkuyten, 2021).…”

Section: Attitudes Toward Compensation and Immigrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, in the English version, Māori were promised "exclusive and undisturbed possession" of their lands, whereas the Māori version grants them tino rangatiratanga, which can be interpreted as "absolute sovereignty" (Stokes, 1992). Potential compensation for Māori remains an ongoing issue in New Zealand (Devos et al, 2020;Hill, 2016). Although the conflict over territory in New Zealand is often framed as a conflict between Māori and the Crown, there is also opposition to compensation for Māori by individual New Zealand Europeans (Kirkwood et al, 2005), and public opinion has a substantive impact on public policy (Burstein, 2016).…”

Section: Research Context: New Zealandmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who owns the land? Territorial ownership understandings and intergroup relations in a settler society

Nooitgedagt

Martinović

Verkuyten

et al. 2022

J Applied Social Pyschol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflicts over the ownership of territory have shaped intergroup relations between indigenous and nonindigenous groups in settler societies. Using latent profile analysis, we found four different subgroups of individuals among a sample of European New Zealanders based on their perceived ingroup (NZ European) and outgroup (Māori) ownership. Most people (75.9%) perceived shared territorial ownership, but there were also individuals predominantly recognizing ingroup ownership (8.2%), outgroup ownership (6.4%), or no territorial ownership (9.4%).These subgroups differed in meaningful ways in their support for principles of ownership, perceived rights and responsibilities, compensation for Māori, and support for strict immigration policies. | INTRODUCTIONPeople can have a perception of ownership which involves the sense that a certain object or place belongs to them (Pierce et al., 2003). Just as one can feel to personally own something ("mine"), one can also think that something belongs to one's group ("ours"). This is referred to as collective psychological ownership (Pierce & Jussila, 2011), such as ownership of territories like "our beach" (Due & Riggs, 2008), "our neighborhood" (Toruńczyk-Ruiz & Martinović, 2020), and "our land" (Nijs, Martinović, Verkuyten et al., 2021). Importantly, people not only have a sense of what belongs to their ingroup, but can also recognize outgroups as owners (Nooitgedagt, Martinović et al., 2021; Storz et al., 2021). Collective psychological ownership perceptions can have important implications in settler societies that were colonized by predominantly European settlers, and where disputes and conflicts over the ownership of territory have shaped intergroup relations between indigenous and nonindigenous (settler) groups (Alfred & Corntassel, 2005). However, not much is known about the distinct ways in which individuals subjectively combine perceptions of ingroup and outgroup territorial ownership in these settings. | The current studyThe first and primary aim of the current study is to examine qualitatively different understandings of territorial collective ownership that nonindigenous people can have by considering three related key aspects of collective ownership: who is seen as the owner, why is that group seen as the owner, and what ownership implies in terms of perceived rights and responsibilities.The first aspect of collective ownership ("who") refers to the question which group is considered to own a territory, and we will examine different ways in which ingroup and outgroup territorial ownership beliefs can be subjectively combined. In contrast to examining associations between variables (a variable centered approach, e.g., Storz et al., 2021), we will use a person-centered approach to examine the possibility

show abstract

“…Beyond identifying subgroups of individuals, and as a matter of construct validity (Osborne & Sibley, 2017), we further examine whether these expected subgroups are meaningfully distinct from one another in their attitudes towards two social issues that have been typically considered in research on feelings of territorial ownership, and which are both relevant in the context of New Zealand: attitudes towards compensation for Indigenous Peoples (Devos et al, 2020;Nooitgedagt, Figueiredo, et al, 2021) and attitudes towards immigration (Johnston et al, 2010;.…”

Section: Attitudes Towards Compensation and Immigration In New Zealandmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Potential compensation for Māori remains an ongoing issue in New Zealand (Devos et al, 2020;Hill, 2016). Although the conflict over territory in New Zealand is often framed as a conflict between Māori and the Crown, there is also opposition to compensation for Māori by individual New Zealand Europeans (Kirkwood et al, 2005), and public opinion has a substantive impact on public policy (Burstein, 2016).…”

Section: Research Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whose land is it?

Nooitgedagt¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conceptions of national identity and opposition to bicultural policies in New Zealand: A comparison of majority and minority perspectives

Cited by 9 publications

References 42 publications

Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China

Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China

Who owns the land? Territorial ownership understandings and intergroup relations in a settler society

Whose land is it?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About