Conceptions of university students on microplastics in Germany

Abstract

Microplastics are a global challenge and a frequently studied environmental issue. Hence, the knowledge body about microplastics within the scientific community is growing fast and challenges an elaborated knowledge transfer from science to the general public. Just as well-informed people are the basis for reducing microplastics’ impact on the environment, knowledge of the audience’s conceptions is the basis for an accurate and successful dissemination of scientific findings. However, insights into the publics’ perceptions of microplastics are still rare. The present study aimed to capture students’ conceptions about microplastics based on their individual experiences following qualitative inductive, exploratory research. Therefore, 267 students of a state university in Germany responded to a paper-and-pencil questionnaire containing open and closed questions on microplastic-related conceptual understanding, risk perception, information behavior, sources, and sinks. The inductive classifying of all responses by a qualitative content analysis revealed six basic concepts: 1) Microplastics are mainly understood as small plastic particles. 2) Microplastics are closely associated with its negative consequences. 3) The most labeled source in households is plastic packaging. 4) Compared to other water bodies, microplastics are rarely suspected in groundwater. 5) A high threat awareness exists in classifying microplastics as very dangerous and dangerous. 6) Media such as TV or the Internet are the most crucial information sources while the school has less importance in acquiring information. It is precisely this pattern that indicates the need for profound science communication to establish a joint and scientifically sound knowledge base in society. Knowledge about conceptions of potential “customers” allows tailor-made scientific knowledge transfers to shape public awareness, initiate changes in thoughts and prepare the field for collaborative behavior.

Revisiting secondary students’ ideas about air pollution. The challenge of particulate matter

“…Finally, the necessity to address these challenges in classrooms is not only because we have observed students' limitations in their ideas of sophisticated versions of the particulate model of matter. Apart from air pollution, there is a growing variety of phenomena that involve reasoning at the mesoscale, such as microplastics contamination (Raab and Bogner, 2021), nano devices (Tretter et al, 2006) or the transmission of nanoparticles or viruses. Understanding all these relevant phenomena is part of students' scientific literacy and citizenship and requires a sophisticated understanding of the particulate model of matter that clearly focuses on both nature and structure at different scales.…”

Lighting Up for Learning─Fluorescence Analysis of Microplastic Particles by Secondary School Students Using Nile Red

“…A successful transition to sustainability requires an informed society . It is well-known that microplastics are small plastic particles, but there are still knowledge gaps regarding their sources, occurrence, and impacts. − We aimed to address this gap with input designed on this topic. There is also a difference in how media communicate the risks induced by microplastics and how science communicates those facts .…”

“…Thus, a major part of the public knows that microplastics are small plastic particles with potentially negative effects. However, there are knowledge gaps regarding sources and occurrence of microplastic particles and their effects and risks on human health. − …”

Stakeholders' Perspectives on Microplastics in Sludge Applied to Agricultural Land

“…Most of these studies have focused on specific groups, e.g. university students (Chang, 2015;Raab and Bogner, 2021) or consumers of personal care products (Anderson et al, 2016) and have targeted MPs impacts on the marine environment. Thiele and Hudson (2021) conducted an on-line survey on the subject of MPs risks in general with both lay and "topicexperienced" respondents.…”