2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts for future missions to search for technosignatures

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can exclude scenarios in which all G-dwarf stars would have been settled by now, but the possibility remains open that a Galactic Club exists across all K-dwarf or M-dwarf stars. The search for technosignatures in low-mass systems provides one way to constrain the presence of such a Galactic Club (e.g., Lingam & Loeb 2021;Socas-Navarro et al 2021;Haqq-Misra et al 2022;Wright et al 2022). Existing searches to-date have placed some limits on radio transmissions (e.g., Harp et al 2016;Enriquez et al 2017;Price et al 2020;Zhang et al 2020) and optical signals (e.g., Howard et al 2007;Tellis & Marcy 2015;Schuetz et al 2016) that might be associated with technological activity, but such limits can only weakly constrain the Galactic Club hypothesis.…”
Section: The K-dwarf Galactic Clubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can exclude scenarios in which all G-dwarf stars would have been settled by now, but the possibility remains open that a Galactic Club exists across all K-dwarf or M-dwarf stars. The search for technosignatures in low-mass systems provides one way to constrain the presence of such a Galactic Club (e.g., Lingam & Loeb 2021;Socas-Navarro et al 2021;Haqq-Misra et al 2022;Wright et al 2022). Existing searches to-date have placed some limits on radio transmissions (e.g., Harp et al 2016;Enriquez et al 2017;Price et al 2020;Zhang et al 2020) and optical signals (e.g., Howard et al 2007;Tellis & Marcy 2015;Schuetz et al 2016) that might be associated with technological activity, but such limits can only weakly constrain the Galactic Club hypothesis.…”
Section: The K-dwarf Galactic Clubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are projects are attempting to look for signs of intelligent life capable of producing 'technosignatures', where life has evolved to a level that can produce signs of technical capability, such as atmospheric industrial pollution, orbiting megastructures, artificial radio signals, like those produced on Earth [19,20].…”
Section: Higher Life-forms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this paper is to encourage a broader range of astronomers to consider the relevance of technosignatures to their research by serving as a resource that describes the detectability of various nonradio technosignatures with current and future missions. The second research agenda objective was to develop mission concepts that are optimized for technosignature science and was explored by Socas-Navarro et al [64], which included overview of future mission possibilities as well as a metric for ranking the relative detectability of technosignatures. The third research agenda objective recognized that the first detection of a technosignature might be an anomalous finding in a field other than astrobiology, which led Singam et al [65] to develop a conceptual framework for evaluating "noncanonical astrophysical phenomena" as potential technosignatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%