Backscattering Spectrometry 1978
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-173850-1.50008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts of Backscattering Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
837
0
44

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,081 publications
(894 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
13
837
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…3.12 of [44]) by Equation 4, and refers to the energy lost by the particle scattered from element C of the matrix M; that is, considering both the energy lost inelastically by the incident beam before the scattering event and by the scattered beam on its way to the detector, together with the energy lost elastically (to the recoiled nucleus) during the scattering event. It is because ε is a function of beam energy, and of course because the energy lost kinematically by the incident ion to the target recoiled nucleus in the elastic backscattering event depends on the mass of C, that the stopping factor is a function of both C and M.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.12 of [44]) by Equation 4, and refers to the energy lost by the particle scattered from element C of the matrix M; that is, considering both the energy lost inelastically by the incident beam before the scattering event and by the scattered beam on its way to the detector, together with the energy lost elastically (to the recoiled nucleus) during the scattering event. It is because ε is a function of beam energy, and of course because the energy lost kinematically by the incident ion to the target recoiled nucleus in the elastic backscattering event depends on the mass of C, that the stopping factor is a function of both C and M.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the D concentration at depths greater than 0.5 µm, an analyzing beam of 3 He ions with energies varied from 0.69 to 2.0 MeV was used [13]. The amount of deposited W atoms was determined by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) [14].…”
Section: Diagnostics Of the Deposition Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The lattice damage induced by implantation was evaluated by Rutherford backscattering/channeling spectrometry (RBS/C). χ min is the channeling minimum yield in RBS/C, which is the ratio of the backscattering yield at channeling condition to that for a random beam incidence [42]. Therefore, χ min indicates the lattice disordering degree upon implantation.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%