1996
DOI: 10.1080/01463379609370001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts of “culture”: Implications for intercultural communication research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial training was developed by anthropologists and linguists and included anthropological theories of culture at the time. However, this content was subsequently excluded after complaints from training participants who thought it was too hard to understand and not practical (Moon, 1996). Much of the training that has followed has represented societies as culturally homogenous and static, ignoring the complex and fluid nature of culture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The initial training was developed by anthropologists and linguists and included anthropological theories of culture at the time. However, this content was subsequently excluded after complaints from training participants who thought it was too hard to understand and not practical (Moon, 1996). Much of the training that has followed has represented societies as culturally homogenous and static, ignoring the complex and fluid nature of culture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller cultural units, such as tone of voice, gestures, orientations towards time and spatial relations, became the focus (Leeds-Hutwitz 1990). The anthropological content was replaced with an approach which focused on the intercultural encounters between individuals (Moon, 1996). The FSI trainees were much more receptive to Hall's revised program.…”
Section: Cultural Training: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations