1996
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1996.11505776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts of Value, Efficiency, and Democracy in Institutional Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found, however, that within a stable system, a conservative consensus is developed and this can make the organization at the accident site unstable. Klein and Miller (1996) describe this behaviour as an 'imbecile routine'. If the unity of the collective is strong, a behaviour not contributing to success could prevail against renewal.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found, however, that within a stable system, a conservative consensus is developed and this can make the organization at the accident site unstable. Klein and Miller (1996) describe this behaviour as an 'imbecile routine'. If the unity of the collective is strong, a behaviour not contributing to success could prevail against renewal.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Weblenian meaning, the term "instrumental" refers to performance that is founded on notions such as causal reasoning, purposive thoughts, and cause and effect, as well as other concepts. The phrase "ceremonial" refers to authority, social standing, custom, tradition, and precedent (Klein and Miller, 1996). In other words, institutions are not solely logical structures.…”
Section: Institutional Explanations For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus immediately following the very passage in which Veblen appears to suggest that institutions are settled habits of thought, he writes: "But it would be mere absentmindedness in any student of civilization therefore to admit that these or any other human institutions have this stability which is currently imputed to them or that they are in this way intrinsic to the nature of things. The acceptance by the 9 A practical reliance upon the dichotomy in question has been most apparent within the dominant North American strand of institutionalist thinking, with some contributors even prepared to argue that it constitutes the tradition's central analytic tool or defining core (see, e.g., Waller 1982;Munkirs 1988;Klein and Miller 1996). However, not all institutionalists have accepted the dichotomy as formulated, even within the North American movement.…”
Section: Veblen's Dichotomy?mentioning
confidence: 99%