1999
DOI: 10.1080/13811119908258338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual confusion about intentions and motives of nonfatal suicidal behavior: A discussion of terms employed in the literature of suicidology

Abstract: The confusing and inconsistent employment of the terms intentions and motives in the literature of suicidology is exemplified and discussed. It is concluded that when nonfatal suicidal acts are explained in terms of something the patients wanted to achieve by the act (which mainly is the case), whether it was to die or something else, the appropriate term will be intention(s), not motive(s).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Maris and colleagues, intent is “the purpose a person has in using a particular means (e.g., suicide) to effect a result (e.g., death)” (, p. 37). Hjelmeland and Knizek () discuss the confusion in the literature between motives, reasons, and intentions. According to these authors, motives are to be correlated with causal explanations of behavior, while reasons and intentions are more subjective and are related to teleological explanations of behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Maris and colleagues, intent is “the purpose a person has in using a particular means (e.g., suicide) to effect a result (e.g., death)” (, p. 37). Hjelmeland and Knizek () discuss the confusion in the literature between motives, reasons, and intentions. According to these authors, motives are to be correlated with causal explanations of behavior, while reasons and intentions are more subjective and are related to teleological explanations of behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as this intent can be asserted or denied retrospectively by suicide attempters, it is unreliable (Kjøller, Nørlev, & Davidsen, 2004) and it brings us back to the idea that those individuals who do not really wish to die may use this type of behavior in an instrumental way, possibly with undertones of manipulation and of deliberate minimization of the act (Dear, 2001). This second category of behavior can serve multiple purposes, notably that of sending a message, albeit awkwardly, to family and friends (Hjelmeland & Knizek, 1999). This behavior can constitute not only a call for help, but also, for some, a morbid form of self‐help (Favazza, 1999).…”
Section: Confusion In Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these observations there is little research that offers a more solid empirical view on the issue of intentions. Several authors have pointed to the fact that intentions are often confused with motives (Hjelmeland & Knizek, 1999; Silverman & Berman, 2005). Maris et al (2000) defined (the basically legal concept) motive as “the cause or reason that moves the will and induces action,” and intent is “the purpose a person has in using a particular means (e.g., suicide) to effect a result”(p. 37).…”
Section: The Distinction Between Because and In Order Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hjelmeland and Knizek (1999) reviewed the psychological literature on the meanings of intentions and motives. Though some authors used motives (or reasons) and intentions as synonyms, generally the recommendation was to distinguish between the two.…”
Section: The Distinction Between Because and In Order Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation