1987
DOI: 10.1080/08940630.1987.10466308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Design of a Massive Aerometric Tracer Experiment (MATEX)

Abstract: in conjunction with The MATEX Design Group A hypothetical field experiment is evaluated that relates, through tracer releases, reactive pollutant emissions to long range transport and deposition. The feasibility of such an approach is established provided certain requirements can be met. The experiment must: (a) trace emissions from several sources simultaneously and repetitively over an extended period of time, (b) link a tracer to the chemical behavior of emissions, and (c) apply a statistically sound method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I also disagree with Dr. Mathai regarding the peerreviewed MATEX study design, 66 which should be required reading for those who believe that releasing an inert tracer gas from a source is the "magic bullet" for estimating SO 4 2-contributions to haze. MATEX clearly and definitively quantified the deficiencies of this approach, and these findings were reinforced by subsequent tracer-release source attribution studies.…”
Section: Response From John G Watson Critical Review Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I also disagree with Dr. Mathai regarding the peerreviewed MATEX study design, 66 which should be required reading for those who believe that releasing an inert tracer gas from a source is the "magic bullet" for estimating SO 4 2-contributions to haze. MATEX clearly and definitively quantified the deficiencies of this approach, and these findings were reinforced by subsequent tracer-release source attribution studies.…”
Section: Response From John G Watson Critical Review Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion of MATEX, 66 a proposal that was never implemented, also would have been more appropriate under the science section. Discussion of the "Clean Power Act of 2001" (S556), a bill currently under consideration by the U.S. Senate, also was inappropriate.…”
Section: Critique Of the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard answer is "The more the better," but this is not always practical or acceptable to sponsors. The Massive Atmospheric Transport Experiment (MATEX) design (Hidy et al, 1985a(Hidy et al, , 1985b(Hidy et al, , 1987 went to great lengths to evaluate methods and costs for establishing the influence of long-range transport of power-plant sulfur emissions in the eastern United States using reactive sulfur isotopes combined with nonreactive chlorohydrocarbon tracer gases. This analysis established that the simple concept of coreleased reactive and nonreactive gases was impractical owing to the high costs for sulfur isotopic plume tracing and ambient sampling.…”
Section: Network Design and Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis established that the simple concept of coreleased reactive and nonreactive gases was impractical owing to the high costs for sulfur isotopic plume tracing and ambient sampling. MATEX evolved into a simpler design, the EMEFS (Hidy, 1987;AES, 1993;Ruff et al, 1985), which favored spatial monitors placed specifically for improved model evaluation. The EMEFS design did not analyze the need for sites to characterize both regional-scales >100 km and neighborhood to urban scales <100 km.…”
Section: Network Design and Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fine aerosol species are classified into five major types: sulfates, nitrates, organics, lightabsorbing carbon, and soil. [3][4][5][6][7] Other fine species such as nonsoil potassium, sea spray, and other trace elements are also estimated but are less important from a visibility standpoint. Estimation of the major aerosol species is discussed below.…”
Section: Determination Of Aerosol Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%