2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4999379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual design of magnetic spectrometer for inverse-Compton X-ray source in MeV region

Abstract: A novel magnetic spectrometer for Inverse-Compton X-ray source is proposed. Compton recoil electrons are generated by a lithium converter, and then confined by a complex collimator and spectrally resolved by a sector-shaped double-focusing magnet. A method of optimization for the converter is investigated, and the dependence of the best energy resolution on converting efficiency is quantitatively revealed. The configuration of the magnet is specially designed to cover a wide range of electron energy and to ach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As illustrated in Figure 8, the system's detection efficiencies for 1.173 MeV and 1.332 MeV gamma rays were determined to be 1.58 × 10 −7 and 1.86 × 10 −7 , respectively. In comparison, the Compton spectrometer [14,15,23], which also detects MeV-energy gamma rays using Compton electrons, exhibits a detection efficiency of approximately 10 −4 , higher than that of our system. The efficiency discrepancy between the two systems primarily stems from two factors: 1.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energy Resolution and Detection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As illustrated in Figure 8, the system's detection efficiencies for 1.173 MeV and 1.332 MeV gamma rays were determined to be 1.58 × 10 −7 and 1.86 × 10 −7 , respectively. In comparison, the Compton spectrometer [14,15,23], which also detects MeV-energy gamma rays using Compton electrons, exhibits a detection efficiency of approximately 10 −4 , higher than that of our system. The efficiency discrepancy between the two systems primarily stems from two factors: 1.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energy Resolution and Detection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As illustrated in Figure 8 , the system’s detection efficiencies for 1.173 MeV and 1.332 MeV gamma rays were determined to be and , respectively. In comparison, the Compton spectrometer [ 14 , 15 , 23 ], which also detects MeV-energy gamma rays using Compton electrons, exhibits a detection efficiency of approximately , higher than that of our system. The efficiency discrepancy between the two systems primarily stems from two factors: Our system achieves gamma-ray energy-selective imaging by recovering images from Compton electrons, employing a collimator to improve spatial resolution at the expense of some detection efficiency because of electron divergence and energy spread.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation