First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/esem.2007.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Differences Among Functional Size Measurement Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main differences between the methods arise based on how each method defines functional size, and thus BFCs and BFC Types, as well as the differences in the rules of measurement [14]. These are explained further in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: A Functional Size Measurement -Ifpug and Cosmic Fpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main differences between the methods arise based on how each method defines functional size, and thus BFCs and BFC Types, as well as the differences in the rules of measurement [14]. These are explained further in the following paragraphs.…”
Section: A Functional Size Measurement -Ifpug and Cosmic Fpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though FSM methods have a similar aim to measure the functional size attribute of FUR, they differ with respect to their measurement processes, how sub-attributes of functional size are measured and the rules and granularity level for measurement [14]. Therefore, even though traditionally all FSM methods state FP as the unit of measure, in fact, the reported measurements are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because our slicing is at the function level, we found it more appropriate to express size by counting the number of functions per slice as the function count (FC). First developed by Albrecht , several process standards based on functions such as the ISO/IEC 20968 and ISO/IEC 14143 have used functions to determine software size . Using the slices, we propose metrics that measure CC and FC to evaluate the complexity of code based on its impact at the function level.…”
Section: Background and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed discussion on the differences and similarities between these two methods can be found in [10].…”
Section: Fsm Methods Utilizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these differences, they are expected to produce similar results as they are based on a set of shared principles. A number of research studies have been performed in order to clarify their conceptual basis and establish the common principles of FSM methods [8], [10], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%