Conceptual Framework And Mentality As Postulates Of Cognitive Linguistics

Fefelova, Galina G.; Fatkullina, F. G.; Sagitova, Alfira F.; Хайруллина, Р. Х.; F., Fluza G. Fatkullina

doi:10.15405/epsbs.2021.02.02.32

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the structure of mythological conceptualization a man is in the focus of study being a subject and an object of cognition. In a modern linguistic paradigm a dominating anthropocentric approach has become the basis of a significant number of studies and some scientists as Fefelova et al (2020) even differentiate "linguistic personality as a key concept of anthropolinguistics", which predetermines "the consideration of the semantic …features of lexemes in correlation with cognitive structures that underlie them" (Drygina et al, 2019, p. 409). The world famous experts in the field of cognitive linguistics consider frame as a structural part of a concept (Miroshnichenko et al, 2018, Prihodko & Prykhodchenko, 2018.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spotlight On Mythoconcepts In A Digital Context

Shevchenko¹

2021

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article spotlights on myphoconcepts in a diachronical aspect. Ancient archetypes underlie mythoconcepts which represent mental ideas of a nation being structural components of a mythological picture of the world. As more and more information becomes digital, "digital natives" create mythoconcepts in a digital context. Currently, interest in the mythological picture of the world is increasing, nevertheless, it remains a little-studied area of linguistic knowledge. The relevance of the article is determined by contemporary mythologization in a digital context. The purpose of the research is to analyze mythoconcepts in a diachronical aspect comparing traditional and new cultural notions underlying them in digital contexts. The authors differentiate mythoconcepts and mythologemes, recognizing the mythoconcepts as certain stereotypes imbued with cultural meanings; meanwhile a mythologeme is an invariant complex of ideas and a "core" stable constituent part of mythoconcepts. The "core" of mythoconcepts -mythologemes represent the unchangeable archaic part which is transmitted from generation to generation. The key point is that a frame-structure of a mythoconcept can be represented by a blending of real (R) and irreal (IR) frames. The part of a mythoconcept determined by irreal descriptive and action frames with zoomorphic characteristics doesn`t transform in a diachronic aspect. It can be explained by an obscure nature of mytholexemes: their denotation is sacred, mystical, difficult to "touch", taboo.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%