2005
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2005.18783405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology.

Abstract: Scholars have been interested in the extent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we tested for configural similarity of our construct relations across levels (Chen & Bliese, 2005). We aggregated the main covariates, mediators, and moderator to the nursing unit level ( n = 887), rather than the hospital level, and again linked them to patient experience data using common unit identifiers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we tested for configural similarity of our construct relations across levels (Chen & Bliese, 2005). We aggregated the main covariates, mediators, and moderator to the nursing unit level ( n = 887), rather than the hospital level, and again linked them to patient experience data using common unit identifiers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, climate has been actively studied in the organizational literature for over 40 years. Methodological advances such as hierarchical modeling have provided the means to rigorously examine the relationship between clinic climate and performance (Morgeson and Hofmann 1999; Chen, Bliese, and Mathieu 2005; Mathieu and Taylor 2007). The current study demonstrates the potential relevance of climate research to guideline‐based care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calculated the scale intraclass correlations ICC (1) and ICC (2). ICC (1) indexes the reliability of individual ratings, and ICC (2) represents the reliability of a group average rating (Chen, Bliese, and Mathieu, ). The intraclass correlations suggested acceptable reliability (ICC1 = .36; ICC2 = .64; F = 2.78, p < .001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%