Humorous Discourse 2017
DOI: 10.1515/9781501507106-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual integration and humor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within cognitive linguistics, conceptual blending has been used in studies of a wide variety of linguistic phenomena, from studies of meaning construction to the studies of grammatical patterns. Considering the ubiquity of blending, it is not surprising that conceptual blending theory has found its application in the study of humor (Coulson 1996;2002;Kyratzis 2003;Lundmark 2003;Marín-Arrese 2003;Bergen 2004;Fujii 2008;Delibegović Džanić & Berberović 2010;Dynel 2011;2018;Dore 2015;Libura 2017). Coulson (2002) claims that " [t]hough not all blends are humorous, blending does seem to be an inherent feature of humor".…”
Section: Conceptual Blending Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within cognitive linguistics, conceptual blending has been used in studies of a wide variety of linguistic phenomena, from studies of meaning construction to the studies of grammatical patterns. Considering the ubiquity of blending, it is not surprising that conceptual blending theory has found its application in the study of humor (Coulson 1996;2002;Kyratzis 2003;Lundmark 2003;Marín-Arrese 2003;Bergen 2004;Fujii 2008;Delibegović Džanić & Berberović 2010;Dynel 2011;2018;Dore 2015;Libura 2017). Coulson (2002) claims that " [t]hough not all blends are humorous, blending does seem to be an inherent feature of humor".…”
Section: Conceptual Blending Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irony and sarcasm still attract a lot of attention now despite the fact that their first descriptions date back to the antiquity (Bailin, 2015;Garamendia, 2018;Vaulina & Bulataya, 2019). The traditional view on these phenomena stating that the addressee should understand the meaning of the utterance vice versa, has been enriched by the application of the pragmatic principles of communication (Piskorska, 2014), cognitive theories (Filik et al, 2018;Giora, 2016;Libura, 2017) and ontological and computational approaches (Taylor, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…intertekstualności) w drodze analizy treści. Należy jednak zaznaczyć, że humor nie jest automatyczną odpowiedzią na bodziec (Hurley i in., 2017, s. 20), lecz dynamiczną konstrukcją znaczenia (Brône, 2017;Libura, 2017). Wymaga przywoływania konkretnych struktur wiedzy w umyśle, aktywnego przetwarzania i wnioskowania oraz analizy gęstych sieci powiązań znaczeniowych dzięki wykorzystaniu inteligencji semantycznej.…”
unclassified