Three recent conceptualizations have been proposed to account for the manner in which goal-directed activity in one situation can influence judgments, behavioral decisions, and overt behavior in a later situation. One, which accounts for the effect of behavioral mindsets (Wyer & Xu, 2010, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 107), conceptualizes the effect of performing goal-directed behavior in a situation on the strategies selected for use in attaining quite different goals in a later, unrelated situation. A second, stimulated by Anderson's (1983, The architecture of cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) conceptualization of cognitive productions, accounts for the effects of stimuli of which one is not completely aware on motor behavior that is performed with little if any cognitive mediation. The third, suggested by Barsalou's (1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577; 2008, Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617) conceptualization of perceptual symbol systems (Barsalou, 1999), accounts for the associations of not only semantic concepts and their metaphorical meanings but also visual images, affective reactions, sensory stimulation (taste, smell, etc.), and behavioral dispositions. Recent research exemplifying effects of each of these formulations is reviewed, and an approach for conceptually integrating their implications into a more general formulation of information processing is suggested.
K E Y W O R D Sgrounded cognition, mindsets, priming, procedural knowledge, productions
| INTRODUCTIONAlthough people's thoughts, feelings, and overt behavior are often consciously goal-directed, they can also occur spontaneously with little if any cognitive deliberation. They can be elicited in part by characteristics of the situation in which they occur, but are also influenced by previously acquired concepts and knowledge. However, people typically do not consider all of the relevant knowledge they have acquired (Taylor & Fiske, 1978). Rather, they restrict their consideration to a small portion of it that happens to come to mind easily at the time.Consequently, objectively irrelevant situational factors that influence the subset of knowledge that is accessible in memory at the time people make a judgment can have an impact on this judgment and decisions that are based on it.This observation is not controversial. After considerable research during the past four decades, the effects of knowledge accessibility on judgments are now taken for granted. Thus, procedures for influencing the subset of knowledge that people have accessible in memory have become a standard methodological tool in determining the cognitive bases for individuals' responses to the situations they encounter and the information they receive.Theoretical formulations of the processes that underlie the effects of knowledge activation and its consequences (e.g., Collins & Loftus, 1975;Higgins, Bargh, & Lombardi, 1985;Hintzman, 1986; Wyer & Srull, 1989) have also received broad support. However, theseMost of the writing of ...