1964
DOI: 10.1037/h0043819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual sorting and personality adjustment in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-7-Various classification systems are available for scoring the bases for groupings in object-sorting tasks (see Kogan, 1971). For example, Kennedy and Kates (1964) and Rapaport, Gill, and Schafer (1945) have proposed schemes based on the adequacy and level of abstraction of groupings, respectively. Such schemes obviously make distinctions along a quality dimension, and hence run counter to the present study's purpose of characterizing classification behavior in more stylistic and value-free terms.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-7-Various classification systems are available for scoring the bases for groupings in object-sorting tasks (see Kogan, 1971). For example, Kennedy and Kates (1964) and Rapaport, Gill, and Schafer (1945) have proposed schemes based on the adequacy and level of abstraction of groupings, respectively. Such schemes obviously make distinctions along a quality dimension, and hence run counter to the present study's purpose of characterizing classification behavior in more stylistic and value-free terms.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with the observation of Rapaport et al (1945), the thinking processes in grouping such pictures are quite vulnerable to emotional and social maladjustment. In a study of normal 12-year-old children who differed in their level of personal and social adjustment but not in IQ Kennedy and Kates (1964) found that the poorly adjusted children were inferior on categorization adequacy. Emotional and social maladjustment, whether severe or slight, seems to impair the ability to abstract an appropriate property or properties from the many properties of a target picture that could be used as a basis for grouping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%