Conceptualising Engagement in a Consumer-to-Consumer Context

Abstract

Consumer-to-consumer (C2C) interactions continue to grow in volume in the marketplace. Consumers interact on online platforms to socialise, exchange digital content and information, and trade. Yet, conceptualisations of engagement in marketing contexts are dominated by models based on consumer-brand or consumer-firm interactions, often conceptualised from the perspective of S-D Logic. Alternative frameworks are required to understand engagement in C2C contexts. This paper reports the results of a qualitative investigation of consumer engagement in one C2C context, the online C2C auction, reflecting an experiential view of the consumer. The research sought to conceptualise engagement in a C2C context, explore the relationship between consumer value and consumer engagement in this context, and the role that consumer engagement might play in encouraging ongoing participation in the consumption activity. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 users of online C2C auctions. Three contrasting approaches to analysis were applied to the qualitative dataset – phenomenological analysis of stories of consumption, thematic analysis of interview transcripts, and content analysis to identify words and phrases expressing engagement. A conceptualisation of consumer engagement as a motivational construct in C2C contexts is developed. A cycle of engagement is identified: consumer engagement is seen to arise from consumption experiences that provide value to the consumer; engagement prompts ongoing consumption activity; the cycle of engagement continues as long as value is derived from the consumption experiences. Applications of this conceptualisation of consumer engagement are explored.

Customer Engagement: A Systematic Review and Future Research Priorities

“…Hence, while behaviour is a critical manifestation of engagement, comprehensive evaluations of CE require recognition of it as a multidimensional construct that includes cognitive and emotional dimensions in addition to behaviours (Carvalho and Fernandes 2018; Heinonen 2018). However, concerns over the concept of a psychological state have been raised by Abdul-Ghani et al (2019), who suggest that a state may only be momentary and thus not reflective of the enduring concept of engagement implicit in the literature.…”

The Moderating Effect of Brand Trust on The Relationship Between Customer Brand Engagement and Brand Loyalty: A Conceptual Review

“…Generally, engagement is based on interactions and subsequent from the interaction between the engagement subject and the engagement object. The engagement subject cited in the literature includes customers or consumers, while the engagement objects may include brands, offering, organisations, and organisational activities occurring beyond purchase (Abdul-Ghani, Hyde, & Marshall, 2018;Patterson, Yu, & Ruyter, 2006;van Doorn et al, 2010).…”

A Systematic Literature Review on Antecedents of Consumer Engagement

“…Although, Unal et al (2017) broadly separate the authors' work on engagement in Marketing discipline so far in two areas; Some authors claim engagement as a psychological state while another claim that engagement is a behavioral state. Many authors have propagated the notion that engagement is a psychological state (e.g., (Abdul-Ghani, Hyde, & Marshall, 2018;Bowden, 2009;Brodie, Hollebeek, Jurić, & Ilić, 2011;Calder, Malthouse, & Schaedel, 2009;Higgins & Scholer, 2009;Hollebeek, 2011;Hollebeek, Srivastava, & Chen, 2019;Patterson, Yu, & De Ruyter, 2006).…”