2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualising fields of action for sustainable intensification – A systematic literature review and application to regional case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our 18 priority practices correspond well to Weltin et al. 's () “agronomic development” and “resource use efficiency” fields of action for SI, those relevant at farm, rather than regional/landscape scale. Almost all the SI approaches defined by Weltin et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our 18 priority practices correspond well to Weltin et al. 's () “agronomic development” and “resource use efficiency” fields of action for SI, those relevant at farm, rather than regional/landscape scale. Almost all the SI approaches defined by Weltin et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Many research articles on SI have focused on debating the usefulness of the term, and on refining definitions, at the expense of developing a set of SI practices that could lead to practical gains. We do not suggest that there is a set of practices through which SI can solely be achieved, but rather that progress towards realising practical benefits can be made while a concept is evolving (Owens, 2003;Weltin et al, 2018). For example, Weltin et al (2018) propose an action-oriented conceptual framework to support identification of region-specific SI practices, based on participatory processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations