2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10172158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualization and Analysis of a Next-Generation Ultra-Compact 1.5-kW PCB-Integrated Wide-Input-Voltage-Range 12V-Output Industrial DC/DC Converter Module

Abstract: The next-generation industrial environment requires power supplies that are compact, efficient, low-cost, and ultra-reliable, even across mains failures, to power mission-critical electrified processes. Hold-up time requirements and the demand for ultra-high power density and minimum production costs, in particular, drive the need for power converters with (i) a wide input voltage range, to reduce the size of the hold-up capacitor, (ii) soft-switching over the full input voltage and load ranges, to achieve low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since in this application, the requirements and specifications of the two DC voltage ports (HV and LV) differ greatly, as on the one hand, the high-voltage port mainly has to cover a wide voltage range and, on the other hand, the low-voltage port has to deliver a very high current (up to 200 A) at a low output voltage, the question is raised as to whether an asymmetric topology would be more suitable. The same can be observed in the literature for two-port systems with similarly different port specifications, where different topologies are commonly used in the two converter ports for most efficient power conversion [13]. Consequently, a three-port topology must be developed in which the topology of each port is tailored to the port-specific requirements given by the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since in this application, the requirements and specifications of the two DC voltage ports (HV and LV) differ greatly, as on the one hand, the high-voltage port mainly has to cover a wide voltage range and, on the other hand, the low-voltage port has to deliver a very high current (up to 200 A) at a low output voltage, the question is raised as to whether an asymmetric topology would be more suitable. The same can be observed in the literature for two-port systems with similarly different port specifications, where different topologies are commonly used in the two converter ports for most efficient power conversion [13]. Consequently, a three-port topology must be developed in which the topology of each port is tailored to the port-specific requirements given by the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Consequently, hardly any systems with similar specifications have been presented in the literature so far with which the proposed topology could be compared. Nevertheless, it is possible to get a good impression of the performance of the system presented by comparing the efficiency and power density with an isolated two-port DC/DC converter with similar specifications [13] (PCB-integrated magnetics, 3 kW, V in = 400 V, V out = 12 V), which could be used in EV applications as supply for the LV-bus. It is found, that both the power density (16.4 kW L −1 vs. 21.1 kW L −1 ) and the efficiency (95.6% vs. 96.6%) are only slightly lower in the three-port system, even though there is an additional isolated power path (3.7 kW) between the PFC and the HV port included.…”
Section: B) Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation