2019
DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-1-12-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualization and interpretation of movements in English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Croft (1993) defines metonymy as a process of domain highlighting in which the meaning of an expression can often only be determined against the background of a set of overlapping domains that jointly serve as a base against which the meaning is profiled. In the same viewpoint, various scholars have claimed that metonymy is as pervasive a phenomenon in language and thought as metaphor (Babina & Proskurnich, 2019;Hung, Truong, et al, 2018;Vu, 2016a). It has been argued that the conceptual and linguistic significance of metonymy is comparable to that of metaphor.…”
Section: Conceptual Metonymymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croft (1993) defines metonymy as a process of domain highlighting in which the meaning of an expression can often only be determined against the background of a set of overlapping domains that jointly serve as a base against which the meaning is profiled. In the same viewpoint, various scholars have claimed that metonymy is as pervasive a phenomenon in language and thought as metaphor (Babina & Proskurnich, 2019;Hung, Truong, et al, 2018;Vu, 2016a). It has been argued that the conceptual and linguistic significance of metonymy is comparable to that of metaphor.…”
Section: Conceptual Metonymymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the ordinary knowledge of the face movement, we define it as the movement of the organs constituting the face, that is, the movement of the forehead, eyes, nose, cheeks and cheekbones, lips, chin. On the basis of the written above, we can say that the concept of FACIAL EXPRESSION is integrative and can be represented as a set of concepts that have been designated as UPPER AREA EXPRESSION (FOREHEAD, EYEBROWS), MIDDLE AREA EXPRESSION (EYES, NOSE), LOWER AREA EXPRESSION (MOUTH, CHIN) (Babina & Proskurnich, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%