2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10567-008-0031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing and Re-Evaluating Resilience Across Levels of Risk, Time, and Domains of Competence

Abstract: This article examines potential theoretical constraints on resilience across levels of risk, time, and domain of outcome. Studies of resilience are reviewed as they relate to the prevalence of resilience across levels of risk (e.g., single life events vs. cumulative risk), time, and domains of adjustment. Based on a thorough review of pertinent literature, we conclude that resilience, as a global construct, appears to be rare at the highest levels of risk, and that resilience may benefit from a narrower concep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
178
0
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(236 reference statements)
9
178
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our aim was to explore resilience processes related to participants' most valued friendship. Including participants of varying resilience is appropriate when conceptualising resilience as a process instead of an extraordinary outcome available to a select few (Vanderbilt-Adriance & Shaw, 2008). Future research may consider whether poor-and high-quality friendships operate through distinct processes.…”
Section: Generalizability Of Risk Factors and Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our aim was to explore resilience processes related to participants' most valued friendship. Including participants of varying resilience is appropriate when conceptualising resilience as a process instead of an extraordinary outcome available to a select few (Vanderbilt-Adriance & Shaw, 2008). Future research may consider whether poor-and high-quality friendships operate through distinct processes.…”
Section: Generalizability Of Risk Factors and Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research may consider whether poor-and high-quality friendships operate through distinct processes. Furthermore, longitudinal research should examine the likely iterative processes of facilitating resilience and recruiting, developing or maintaining supportive friendships taking into account the potentially different timeframes required to exhibit growth via the proposed mechanisms along resilience trajectories which may be curvilinear, domain-specific or variable (Hart, Blincow, & Thomas, 2007;Masten & Cicchetti, 2010;Vanderbilt-Adriance & Shaw, 2008).…”
Section: Generalizability Of Risk Factors and Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to specific parenting practices, having a good relationship with a parent is mentioned as a family protective factor for positive child adjustment across social, emotional, and academic domains (Vanderbilt & Shaw, 2008). Research supports the separation of warmth and control dimensions of parent-child relations (Suchman, Rounsaville, DeCoste, & Luthar, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there are many studies on parenting and resilience, most of them (Masten et al, 1999;Vanderbilt & Shaw, 2008) are focused on children and adolescents with a lack of studies among adults, especially older adults. There is evidence that other risk and protective factors intervene and affect the resilience of the individual in their life span (Masten, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesar del largo desarrollo de la investigación asociada a este fenómeno, aún hay dificultades y controversias en su definición (Becoña, 2006) y sobre todo en su operacionalización, ya que distintos investigadores han usado estrategias diferentes para acercarse al constructo (Windle, Bennett y Noyes, 2011). Estas diferencias de aproximación al constructo de la resiliencia van desde el concepto mismo, hasta los componentes bási-cos que se han definido al interior de él: resultados positivos y presencia de adversidad o riesgo (Becoña, 2006;Fergus y Zimmerman, 2005;Vanderbilt-Adriance y Shaw, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified