Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime

Abstract

The governance of climate change has traditionally been conceived as an issue of international co-operation and considered through the lens of regime analysis. Increasingly, scholars of global governance have highlighted the multiple parallel initiatives involving a range of actors at different levels of governance through which this issue is being addressed. In this paper, we argue that this phenomenon warrants a re-engagement with some of the conceptual cornerstones of international studies. We highlight the conceptual challenges posed by the increasing involvement of non-nation-state actors (NNSAs) in the governance of climate change and explore the potential for drawing from alternative theoretical traditions to address these challenges. Specifically, the paper combines insights from neo-Gramscian and governmentality perspectives as a means of providing the critical space required to generate deeper understanding of: (a) the nature of power in global governance; (b) the relationship between public and private authority; (c) the dynamics between structure and agency; and (d) the rationalities and practices of governance. (c) 2009 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Novel Multisector Networks and Entrepreneurship in Urban Climate Governance

“…While global climate change policy has floundered, subnational and local action appears to be accelerating (Okereke et al, 2009). Nonstate actors are taking an increasingly central role, and may be having greater success in pushing through the process of greenhouse gas reduction target setting, policy design, and implementation (Lovell and Liverman, 2010;New et al, 2011;Schroeder and Bulkeley, 2009).…”

Environmental regulation and governance

“…Rather, various terms and theories have been developed to describe and prescribe how NEG operates. These include 'experimentalism ' (de Burca et al 2013), 'post-sovereign environmental governance' (Karkkainen 2004a), 'collaborative governance' (Freeman 1997), 'adaptive governance' (Chaffin et al 2014) and 'global environmental governance' (Okereke et al 2009). …”

Governance of global climate change in the Brazilian Amazon: the case of Amazonian municipalities of Brazil

“…Bulkeley and Newell (2010, 2) state that governing climate change is a complex process because of the multiple scales of political decision-making involved, the fragmented and blurred roles of the state and non-state actors, and the deeply embedded nature of many processes that lead to emissions of GHG. As a multilayered process, climate governance goes beyond the international regime built around the UNFCCC (Okereke et al 2009). Okereke et al (2009) argue that the concept of climate governance focuses on how governing as a process takes place, acknowledges the multiple and relational nature of power and considers that state and society are intertwined.…”

“…As a multilayered process, climate governance goes beyond the international regime built around the UNFCCC (Okereke et al 2009). Okereke et al (2009) argue that the concept of climate governance focuses on how governing as a process takes place, acknowledges the multiple and relational nature of power and considers that state and society are intertwined. As such, the concept recognizes a wide range of actors that have participated in the process of governing climate change and points to the emergence of novel governance arrangements.…”