1999
DOI: 10.1080/002202799183133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing critical thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
227
0
49

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
227
0
49
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also general agreement in the literature that critical thinking cannot be narrowly defined [23,24]. This implies the area and the scopes measured in this study that might also justify this study finding.…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also general agreement in the literature that critical thinking cannot be narrowly defined [23,24]. This implies the area and the scopes measured in this study that might also justify this study finding.…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This, in light with Ennis et al [23], points that critical thinking as a reasonable and reflective thinking that focuses on deciding what to believe or do. Critical thinking is an analytical process of arriving at judgments that is directed by a specific end purpose to arrive at a logical, rational, and reasonable problem solution [2,24,25]. Some authors explain that critical thinking is the process of an individual taught to reason for improving the solution [26].…”
Section: Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Smith (1977) reveals three instructor-influenced factors which correlate positively to college students' improved CT score: (a) instructors' praise, encouragement or use of student ideas; (b) the amount of interaction among students; and (c) the amount and cognitive level of student participation. In explaining what is involved in effective CT instruction, Bailin et al (1999) present three elements: (a) engaging students in tasks or activities that require the skills of judgment or assessment; (b) helping students develop intellectual resources (e.g., knowledge of CT principles, dispositions or habits of minds to use CT skills) for dealing with these tasks; and (c) providing a favorable environment where critical enquiry is valued and students are encouraged to think critically. A more recent study by Mathews and Lowe (2011) further summarise the characteristics of effective CT instruction, which includes introducing CT skills related to content domain, providing ample opportunities to practise the skills, inclusion of students in classroom decision-making, and creating an emotionally safe learning environment.…”
Section: Common Features Of Effective Ct Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, having a good perception of the concepts of CT and critical thinker as well as a good understanding of how to convey instruction can help educators in providing the concrete knowledge of what is to be accomplished in teaching CT (Bailin, Case, Coombs, & Daniels, 1999).…”
Section: Journal Of Language Teaching and Research 389mentioning
confidence: 99%