2009
DOI: 10.1177/1368431009103711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing European Society on Non-Normative Grounds

Abstract: For the most part, current reflections on the social seem to overemphasize either homogeneity (society/nation-state, modernization/globalization) or heterogeneity (sociality, cosmopolitanism). Against this, here the argument is put forward that it is appropriate to think of the social as consisting of aspects of homogeneity or shared frames of reference and aspects of heterogeneity at the same time. This thought is developed particularly in contrast to normative concepts such as Bauman's sociality-republicanis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Giddens (1991) and Ritzer (2004b) would tend to see globalisation as a homogenising and standardising phenomenon interpreted by Albrow (1992, p. 248) as a "the process whereby the population of the world is increasingly bonded into a single society" others like Kloos and de Silva (1995) would argue that this view fails to represent the multiplicity of local, regional and other realities. More recently, a new wave of critical thinkers (Almas and Lawrence, 2003;Krossa, 2009) appears to have revisited these sociological convergence theories of globalisation to argue that, in fact, they grossly oversimplify the magnitude of the interaction between the global and the local. Indeed, Robertson (1995Robertson ( , 1996 developed the term "glocalisation" to point out that global forces do not override locality and that homogenisation and heterogenisation are both crucial features of modern life.…”
Section: Globalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Giddens (1991) and Ritzer (2004b) would tend to see globalisation as a homogenising and standardising phenomenon interpreted by Albrow (1992, p. 248) as a "the process whereby the population of the world is increasingly bonded into a single society" others like Kloos and de Silva (1995) would argue that this view fails to represent the multiplicity of local, regional and other realities. More recently, a new wave of critical thinkers (Almas and Lawrence, 2003;Krossa, 2009) appears to have revisited these sociological convergence theories of globalisation to argue that, in fact, they grossly oversimplify the magnitude of the interaction between the global and the local. Indeed, Robertson (1995Robertson ( , 1996 developed the term "glocalisation" to point out that global forces do not override locality and that homogenisation and heterogenisation are both crucial features of modern life.…”
Section: Globalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such decentralized strategies can put hotel management into a closer dialogue with local consumers (Cline, 2002;Yu et al, 2013). Jansen-Verbeke (1996) and Krossa (2009) argue that the globalization of consumer preferences does not necessarily imply convergence in management practices. Globalization (or convergence) and localization (or divergence) are two extremes in the formation of company strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the notion of Europe as a society does not make a great deal of sense if one presupposes the national societies as the main reference points for the notion of society (see Eder 2014, Fligstein 2008, Krossa 2009, O'Mahony 2014. Clearly there is more or less nothing comparable on a European scale to the traditional notions of French or British society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%