“…These images reflect certain “myths” about imagination that help to perpetuate misconceptions about it and also shape how it is conceptualized in leadership: that imagination is of most importance and relevance to children or artists, that it is always unruly and purposeless, that it is only “in the mind,” that it is a static or endowed attribute (quality, trait), that it is always extra ordinary, and that it is largely a “mystery” and, therefore, something that cannot be taught (Asma, 2017; Egan, 1997, 2005; Liu & Noppe-Brandon, 2009). Pair these dominant views of imagination with the perceived risk imagination involves to individuals and to organizations (Hopkins, 2019; Patriotta, 2019), the discomfort it can cause (Hopkins, 2019), the tendency to privilege research of things that are readily observable (Simpson et al, 2017) and measurable, and it may come as no surprise that imagination has been the subject of little leadership research (Judson, 2020). Ultimately, imagination is mentioned far more than it is studied in leadership theory or conceptualized in practice (Judson, 2020).…”