2021
DOI: 10.1177/1071181321651025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing Team Working Memory: Implications for Human-Automation Collaboration

Abstract: Interactions between humans and machines are becoming increasingly more complex and intelligent. Building accurate models of human and automation collaboration will require identification and appropriate measurement of constructs. In this paper, we review several studies on working memory and automation. We then propose that the construct of Team working memory must be validated against established benchmarks and distinguished from individual WM. A separate construct for Team working memory might have implicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, within the cognitive realm, individuals who scored high on measures of working memory showed less trust in automation than their lower working memory counterparts [24]. As the number of automated and human agents increases within networks, and interactions between the two become more complex, Miyake et al [25] have called for investigations into team-working memory on performance, as a way to better understand collaborative capacity within team mental models.…”
Section: Trust In Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, within the cognitive realm, individuals who scored high on measures of working memory showed less trust in automation than their lower working memory counterparts [24]. As the number of automated and human agents increases within networks, and interactions between the two become more complex, Miyake et al [25] have called for investigations into team-working memory on performance, as a way to better understand collaborative capacity within team mental models.…”
Section: Trust In Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%