2018
DOI: 10.1080/24704067.2018.1441738
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing the Dissolution of a Social Marketing Sponsorship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited existing literature on the alliance termination stage, finally, has explored the different types of alliance termination (Madhok et al , 2015; Makino et al , 2007; Min, 2017; Schmoltzi and Wallenburg, 2012), the factors contributing to termination (Gundolf et al , 2018; Pangarkar, 2003, 2009; Sadowski and Duysters, 2008; Shi, 1998; Tsang and Yip, 2007; Yamanoi and Cao, 2014; Zhao and Wang, 2017) and the mode of alliance termination (Pangarkar, 2009; Pedada et al , 2020; Reuer and Zollo, 2005; Sadowski and Duysters, 2008). Compared to the other three stages of alliances (Christoffersen, 2013; Cui, 2013; Dan and Zondag, 2016; Dhir et al , 2021; Dickson et al , 2018; Ferreira and Franco, 2019; Polidoro et al , 2011), the literature on alliance termination remains relatively underexplored. However, an increasing global trend toward alliance termination has encouraged academicians to attend to this stage, and research focused on this domain is gradually increasing (refer to Figure 1).…”
Section: Overview Of the Alliance Termination Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited existing literature on the alliance termination stage, finally, has explored the different types of alliance termination (Madhok et al , 2015; Makino et al , 2007; Min, 2017; Schmoltzi and Wallenburg, 2012), the factors contributing to termination (Gundolf et al , 2018; Pangarkar, 2003, 2009; Sadowski and Duysters, 2008; Shi, 1998; Tsang and Yip, 2007; Yamanoi and Cao, 2014; Zhao and Wang, 2017) and the mode of alliance termination (Pangarkar, 2009; Pedada et al , 2020; Reuer and Zollo, 2005; Sadowski and Duysters, 2008). Compared to the other three stages of alliances (Christoffersen, 2013; Cui, 2013; Dan and Zondag, 2016; Dhir et al , 2021; Dickson et al , 2018; Ferreira and Franco, 2019; Polidoro et al , 2011), the literature on alliance termination remains relatively underexplored. However, an increasing global trend toward alliance termination has encouraged academicians to attend to this stage, and research focused on this domain is gradually increasing (refer to Figure 1).…”
Section: Overview Of the Alliance Termination Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case study, interorganizational reputation is affected by the behaviour of some members and should be restored through appropriate sanctioning. Since the organization involved in the management of the championship is also involved in social initiatives related to sports values and society, this can be an example of consequences on all the participants brought forward by the behaviour of some member (for another example of inter-organizational reputation damage, see also Dickson et al, 2018). Thus, it is always possible to calculate damages, if not directly, at least as a percentage of extant revenues.…”
Section: The Punitive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also involve an assessment of which factors influence image perception. Future research should also examine the role of meta-organizations in managing reputational interdependence within a collective crisis (Dickson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image positively impacts perceptions of quality (Kang & James, 2004) and positive word-of-mouth (Oshimi & Harada, 2016). A positive image is a barrier to the deleterious impacts of athlete transgressions and sporting scandals (Dickson et al, 2018).Moreover, image fit is important because congruence promotes image transfer (Grohs & Reisinger, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%