The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316339732.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing Time in Terms of Space: Experimental Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together with recent evidence suggesting complexity not only in the domains of space and time, but also in the mapping between them (Duffy & Feist, 2017;cf. de la Fuente, Santiago, Román, Dumitrache, & Casasanto, 2014;Gijssels & Casasanto, 2017), this finding begins to outline constraints on the aspects of spatial conceptualization that are likely to be reused in the conceptualization of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Taken together with recent evidence suggesting complexity not only in the domains of space and time, but also in the mapping between them (Duffy & Feist, 2017;cf. de la Fuente, Santiago, Román, Dumitrache, & Casasanto, 2014;Gijssels & Casasanto, 2017), this finding begins to outline constraints on the aspects of spatial conceptualization that are likely to be reused in the conceptualization of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Beyond theories of numerical cognition, these findings also bear on a broader debate about the role of language in cognition (Fodor, 1975;Hume, 1748Hume, /2000Bowerman & Levinson, 2001;Lupyan, 2016;Sapir, 1929;Whorf, 2012). Linguistic-relativity effects have been reported in a variety of domains, including color (Forder & Lupyan, 2019;Regier & Kay, 2009), time (Gijssels & Casasanto, 2017), musical pitch (Dolscheid et al, 2013), and spatial reasoning (Majid et al, 2004). However, the idea that language shapes thought remains controversial (Gleitman & Papafragou, 2013;McWhorter, 2014;Pinker, 1994), in part because there are many versions of the Whorfian hypothesis (Casasanto, 2016;Kay & Kempton, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%