1969
DOI: 10.1037/h0028109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concerning least squares analysis of experimental data.

Abstract: Several different least squares methods appear superficially similar to the conventional analysis of variance and yield identical results when applied to data from balanced experimental designs. When applied to complex problems involving unequal and disproportionate cell frequencies, the several methods yield quite different results. In such cases, the effects tested by the different methods are different; hence, interpretation of results should depend upon the method used. It is not enough merely to state tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
222
0
3

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
222
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be appreciated by analogy to analysis of variance. In the use of analysis of variance to determine whether the weights and scale values are confounded in an averaging task, the significance of the interactions are Cohen, 1968;Overall & Spiegel, 1969 Cohen (1968) has shown how nonlinear interactions can be included in the model as well as linear ones. The most elegant test of Equation 3 as a derivation of averaging would be to show that all of the interaction variance was predicted by the simple Linear X Linear component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be appreciated by analogy to analysis of variance. In the use of analysis of variance to determine whether the weights and scale values are confounded in an averaging task, the significance of the interactions are Cohen, 1968;Overall & Spiegel, 1969 Cohen (1968) has shown how nonlinear interactions can be included in the model as well as linear ones. The most elegant test of Equation 3 as a derivation of averaging would be to show that all of the interaction variance was predicted by the simple Linear X Linear component.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, once these cases are selected, it is possible to analyze them using dummy-variable multiple regression, a technique that is identical to the least-squares analysis of variance (Applebaum & Cramer, 1974;Cohen, 1968;Overall & Spiegel, 1969;Wolf & Cartwright, 1974).…”
Section: Comparison Of Experiments 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to rule out the potential bias due to defining the mating categories as continuous variables with equidistant phenotypes, we also repeated the analyses comparing between two discrete character states of mating system [monogamous (N ϭ 61) vs polygynous (N ϭ 17)]. The alternative would have been to use ANOVA, equivalent to multiple regression on similar dummy variables, but constrained to sum up to zero (Overall and Spiegel, 1969;Dobson, 1990). Because the data are unbalanced with respect to the factors analyzed, no matter which analysis is used, the problem of colinearity and thus, deciding which variable is more influential remains.…”
Section: Control For Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, consider the mainframe version of SPSS's general linear model command in the 1980's. Option 9, a contrast coding least squares regression approach due to Overall and Spiegel (1969), was subsequently shown to test no known statistical hypothesis (see, e.g., Blair & Higgins, 1978a;Blair, 1978;Blair & Higgins, 1978b). Another example is the R aov() function "when conducting analysis of covariance" which "does not work correctly" (Schumacker, 2015, p. 288).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%