2016
DOI: 10.1080/21604851.2017.1244418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concerns, culprits, counsel, and conflict: A thematic analysis of “obesity” and fat discourse in digital news media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, as it relates to health, fat bodies are reframed as a burden on an overworked healthcare system due to poor personal consumption choices. Cain, Donaghue and Ditchburn (2017) clearly identified this pattern in traditional news media. These 'irresponsible individuals' demonstrate the "enmeshment of obesity discourse within the broader cultural logics of neoliberalism, and the difficulty of thinking outside individualistic frames of meaning and accountability" (Cain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Neoliberal Construction Of Fatnessmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Specifically, as it relates to health, fat bodies are reframed as a burden on an overworked healthcare system due to poor personal consumption choices. Cain, Donaghue and Ditchburn (2017) clearly identified this pattern in traditional news media. These 'irresponsible individuals' demonstrate the "enmeshment of obesity discourse within the broader cultural logics of neoliberalism, and the difficulty of thinking outside individualistic frames of meaning and accountability" (Cain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Neoliberal Construction Of Fatnessmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, although this may indicate some progress has been made, research suggests that such viral outrage may have paradoxical effects, creating sympathy for the transgressor (Sawaoka & Monin, 2018). Indeed, content analysis of articles about fatness and/or obesity on five major news aggregators, and the comments that followed them, indicated an extreme and sometimes vitriolic resistance against body acceptance messages, from both authors and public commentators (Cain, Donaghue, & Ditchburn, 2017). Further, many writers decrying the shaming of higher-weight individuals nevertheless position weight as problematic and individuals with higher weights as 'sufferers' in need of compassion and assistance (Cain et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her analysis, Hass suggests that digital media ‘also offers increasing room to stories that contradict the more officially sanctioned trajectories, creating affective spaces that both continue the intimacy between viewer and performer and transform it into potentially even more interactive forms such as direct exchanges in comment threads on Facebook’ (p. 149). Elsewhere, Cain et al (: 184), in their study of digital news media, also reveal that ‘attempts to disrupt the dominant anti‐ “obesity” rhetoric are indeed making their way into the public discourse, albeit primarily through the more informal channels afforded by comments sections of digital media’.…”
Section: Digital Media Public Pedagogies and The Obesity Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boero, 2013;Saguy, 2013), including digital media (e.g. Cain, Donaghue, & Ditchburn, 2017;Lupton, 2017). Insights include the constitutive role of media in dramatising and amplifying the putative ills of 'excess' weight/fatness, the moralisation of health and how such practices reproduce prejudice which, in turn, shapes attitudes to health risk and policy (Saguy, Frederick, & Gruys, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%