2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concerns identified in code review: A fine-grained, faceted classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of these recommendations is to develop secure and easier-to-maintain code 31 , less error-prone 32 , and more readable 33 . The no conformity with conventions is a recurrent issue pointed out by code reviewers, according to a recent study 34 .…”
Section: Code Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of these recommendations is to develop secure and easier-to-maintain code 31 , less error-prone 32 , and more readable 33 . The no conformity with conventions is a recurrent issue pointed out by code reviewers, according to a recent study 34 .…”
Section: Code Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beller et al [7] manually analyzed two open-source systems and studied 1400 code changes in code review to identify fixed code issues, thus demonstrating the practical benefits of the code review process. Gunawardena et al [12] provided a fine-grained taxonomy of defects discussed in code review comments by manually analyzing 417 code review comments. They further identify which code defects can be resolved using existing static analysis tools to reduce the overall effort required in the modern code review process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%