Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review. I investigate how and why the Shah's policies of accommodation and repression escalated the revolutionary mobilization of the Iranian population. Several major theories-micromobilization theory, value expectancy, and bandwagon (critical mass) models-are used to sort out the empirical relationships between protest behavior (violent and nonviolent), strikes, spatial diffusion, concessions, and repression in the year prior to the Shah 's exit from Iran. Estimates from Poisson regression models show that repression had a short-term negative effect and a long-term positive effect on overall levels of protest via repression's influence on spatial diffusion. I infer that this pattern of effects stems from a combination of deterrent and micromobilization mechanisms. Concessions expanded the protests by accelerating massive urban strikes that in turn generated more opposition activity throughout Iran. Spatial diffusion was encouraged by government concessions and massive labor strikes. Mutually reinforcing relationships between concessions, strikes, and spatial diffusion indicate the significance of intergroup dynamics in the revolutionary process. CONCESSIONS, REPRESSION, AND POLITICAL PROTEST IN IRAN 133 I For recent empirical research on the relationship between repression and violence, see Davis and Ward 2 McAdam (1988:134-35) defines the micromobilization context as a small-group setting in which processes of collective attribution are combined with rudimentary forms of organization to produce mobilization for collective action. Examples include preexisting groups like unions, churches, fraternal/service organizations, and friendship networks.

A Comparative Study of State Social Policies on Education and Its Shadow in South Korea and Iran

“…With the great support from West and as a political partner in the region, both leaders were the initiator of many social and economical policies and plans in their underdeveloped country. However, their authoritarian rule saw numerous human rights abuses (see Billet, 1990;Rasler, 1996). Opinion is thus split regarding their legacy between those who credit General Park and Shah for their reforms and those who condemn them authoritarian way of ruling their countries.…”

Factors that Influence the Intention to Adopt Halal Logistics Services among Malaysian SMEs: Formation of Hypotheses and Research Model

“…12, No. 7; Societal Culture Straub (1994), Herbig and Miller (1991), Rogers (1992), Rosero-Bixby and Casterline (1994), Myrdal (1968), Herbig and Palumbo (1994a), Rothwell and Wisseman (1986), Ruttan (1988), Beteille (1977), Offe (1991) 5 Political Condition Wejnert (1996), Bakardjieva (1992), Fleury (1998), James (1993), Rasler (1996), MacLeod (1991), Zhou (1993) 5 Adoption Intention Newly developed for this study 3…”

An Empirical Assessment of Social Unrest Dynamics and State Response in Eurasian Countries

“…Once dissidents have successfully invested the costs of organising themselves and carrying out protest against the State, they try to maintain the momentum and to sustain the protest (Lichbach, 1995). The main argument behind these concepts is that small numbers of people trigger the participation of larger numbers of people over time (Rasler, 1996a and1996b). This persistence is also normal in the State response.…”