2018
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concise Review: Is Cardiac Cell Therapy Dead? Embarrassing Trial Outcomes and New Directions for the Future

Abstract: Stem cell therapy is a promising strategy for tissue regeneration. The therapeutic benefits of cell therapy are mediated by both direct and indirect mechanisms. However, the application of stem cell therapy in the clinic is hampered by several limitations. This concise review provides a brief introduction into stem cell therapies for ischemic heart disease. It summarizes cell‐based and cell‐free paradigms, their limitations, and the benefits of using them to target disease. stem cells translational medicine 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6c-h). We and others have demonstrated that the cell-free secretome derived from stem cells can achieve a level of protection and regeneration similar or superior to the cells themselves 4,[26][27][28][29] . Our observations showed that LSC-Sec was capable of reversing fibrosis caused by Bleo or silica particles (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6c-h). We and others have demonstrated that the cell-free secretome derived from stem cells can achieve a level of protection and regeneration similar or superior to the cells themselves 4,[26][27][28][29] . Our observations showed that LSC-Sec was capable of reversing fibrosis caused by Bleo or silica particles (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, MSCs may target both systemic inflammation and the cardiac pathological changes associated with HFpEF. However, MSC therapy in cardiovascular disease remains of unclear utility, owing to the limited results from relatively small clinical trials, as well as an incomplete understanding of their mechanism of action [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the ALLSTAR study (allogenic intracoronary CDCs injected <6 month after MI; http://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01458405) was abandoned as an interim analysis of data from 142 patients demonstrated a low probability (futility) of achieving a statistically significant difference in the 12‐month primary efficacy endpoint (i.e., relative improvement in infarct size from baseline) . Although this outcome was attributed to unforeseen improvements in the placebo arm (i.e., natural history of the disease) and technical variability seen in the scar measurements by the steering committee, these data highlight the need to maximize indirect (paracrine) repair by heart‐derived cell therapies if clinical translation is to have any hope for success .…”
Section: Heart‐derived Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%