The aspergillides A, B, and C (1, 2, and 3) comprise a novel class of 14-membered macrolides that were isolated by Kusumi and co-workers from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus ostianus strain 01F313 that was cultured in a medium composed of bromine-modified artificial sea water. [1] Their structures were determined by extensive spectroscopic studies, and their absolute configurations were established by X-ray crystallography (for 1 and 2) and the modified Mosher method (for 3).[2] These compounds contain tri-substituted tetrahydro and dihydropyran units and exhibit cytotoxicity against mouse lymphocytic leukemia cells (L1210) with LD 50 values of 2.1, 71.0, and 2.0 mg mL À1 , respectively. Because of their intriguing structural features and biological profile, these polyketides have attracted much attention in the synthetic community as targets for total synthesis. To date, four total syntheses of 1, [3] six of 2, [3c, 4] and two of 3 [5] have been reported. Herein, we describe our total synthesis of the aspergillides A (1) and B (2) from a common macrolide intermediate by employing an interesting transannular oxyMichael reaction [6] as the key step. Our strategy for the synthesis of the aspergillides A and B, illustrated in Scheme 1, proposes the formation of the trisubstituted pyran moiety through a base-mediated transannular oxy-Michael reaction from the 14-membered macrolactone 4. It was thought that stereochemical control at the newly generated stereogenic center at C3 could be achieved by the choice of reaction conditions. The macrolactone 4 could be assembled by using a sequential cross-metathesis and intramolecular Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction of the acyclic precursors 5, which could be accessed from the chiral building block 7 [7] and compound 6, which was known in the literature.[8] Two stereogenic centers at the future C4 and C7 positions in 5 would be created by taking advantage of the convex nature of 7.The optically pure enone 7 with a bicyclo[3.2.1]octane framework, prepared from 2-furfural by a six-step sequence, served as the starting material for the synthesis of the alkenyl alcohol 14 (Scheme 2). Attempted transformation of 7 into 10 using the Wharton transposition [7,9] gave unsatisfactory results ( % 20 % yield), prompting us to find another route. Reduction with NaBH 4 followed by the Hata reaction [10] of Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis. Bn = benzyl, HWE = Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons, TBS = tert-butyldimethylsilyl. then TESCl, DMAP, CH 2 Cl 2 , RT, 1 h; k) LiBH 4 , THF, 0 8C, 3 h, 96 % (over 2 steps, based on recovered diol 13). DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine, mCPBA = m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, Ms = methanesulfonyl, Piv = pivaloyl, TES = triethylsilyl, THF = tetrahydrofuran.