Freedom of Contract and Paternalism 2012
DOI: 10.1057/9781137000323_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conclusion: Old and New in “New Paternalism”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, many contend that repugnant transactions are coercive, exploitative, or involve an undue inducement (Wertheimer and Miller, 2008). More rarely (at least today) restrictions on repugnant exchange are justified as a means of preserving the moral worth of the parties to the exchange (Cserne, 2012). These objections fall under the general heading of paternalism, in the sense that they seek to protect the willing participants in these activities rather than prevent harm to third parties.…”
Section: Repugnance As An Objection To Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many contend that repugnant transactions are coercive, exploitative, or involve an undue inducement (Wertheimer and Miller, 2008). More rarely (at least today) restrictions on repugnant exchange are justified as a means of preserving the moral worth of the parties to the exchange (Cserne, 2012). These objections fall under the general heading of paternalism, in the sense that they seek to protect the willing participants in these activities rather than prevent harm to third parties.…”
Section: Repugnance As An Objection To Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%