2002
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies

Abstract: The results of this non-randomized comparison suggest that induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation is at least as effective in terms of response and survival as standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation. A randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this chemotherapy setting, maximum effort should be made to submit these patients for surgery, as the tumor cells remaining after induction chemotherapy will most likely be resistant to radiation. When the meta-analysis by Tierney et al [63] was planned, radiotherapy was the standard treatment, but in the meantime this has changed to concurrent chemoradiaton. Published data from two consecutive nonrandomized phase II trials suggest that neoadjuvant treatment can be effective as concurrent chemoradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this chemotherapy setting, maximum effort should be made to submit these patients for surgery, as the tumor cells remaining after induction chemotherapy will most likely be resistant to radiation. When the meta-analysis by Tierney et al [63] was planned, radiotherapy was the standard treatment, but in the meantime this has changed to concurrent chemoradiaton. Published data from two consecutive nonrandomized phase II trials suggest that neoadjuvant treatment can be effective as concurrent chemoradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study design was essentially similar to ours. Duenas-Gonzalez et al [14] have also reported the effects of chemoradiation using cisplatin and gemcitabine in locally advanced cervical carcinomas, including adenocarcinomas stage IB2-IIIB. Their data showed that 33 out of 38 cases (87%) had a CR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate trial, 41 patients were treated with standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation. At a median follow-up of 28 and 24 months, respectively, there were no signifi cant differences in PFS or OS in the NAC trial versus the standard chemoradiation trial indicating that either treatment modality may be acceptable [ 18 ]. In 2007, the Korean GOG reported a retrospective review of their experience using different treatment modalities for 692 stage IB2 cervical cancer patients treated between 1995 and 2005.…”
Section: Does Neoadjuvant Therapy Have a Place In The Management Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%