2005
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164x.19.4.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance among biological, interview, and self-report measures of drug use among African American and Hispanic adolescents referred for drug abuse treatment.

Abstract: This study examined the concordance among urine assays, interview measures, and self-report measures of marijuana and cocaine use among 190 drug-abusing/dependent African American and Hispanic adolescents and their families at 3 assessment points of an 18-month randomized clinical trial study. Results demonstrated concordance among urine assays, a calendar method self-report measure (Timeline Follow Back [TLFB]), and a noncalendar method self-report measure (Adolescent Drug Abuse Diagnosis Scale). Diagnostic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to the perception (warranted or otherwise) that these outcome measures are less rigorous than biochemical ones. However, there seem to be discrepancies between self-reported cocaine use and urine assays at baseline, but not at follow-up assessments 39 ; e) our results cannot be extrapolated to women, given that other studies have already shown a significant effect of gender on craving experiences 40 ; f) only cocaine users who agreed to participate in this study were included. Hence, it is not clear whether these findings would apply to individuals who would refuse to participate in clinical studies or fail to meet the inclusion criteria; g) no other psychotherapeutic procedures or incentives were provided alongside CBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This can lead to the perception (warranted or otherwise) that these outcome measures are less rigorous than biochemical ones. However, there seem to be discrepancies between self-reported cocaine use and urine assays at baseline, but not at follow-up assessments 39 ; e) our results cannot be extrapolated to women, given that other studies have already shown a significant effect of gender on craving experiences 40 ; f) only cocaine users who agreed to participate in this study were included. Hence, it is not clear whether these findings would apply to individuals who would refuse to participate in clinical studies or fail to meet the inclusion criteria; g) no other psychotherapeutic procedures or incentives were provided alongside CBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, study participants may misrepresent drug use due to social desirability bias, stigma, poor recall, poorly worded questions, or poorly worded response categories in surveys and interviews [23,24], all of which could result in misclassification of measured exposures. Although studies have shown that the use of Audio Computer-Assisted Self Interview (ACASI) increases reporting of sensitive and stigmatized behaviors [25,26], research suggests that the validity of self-reported drug use varies by population [27], race/ ethnicity [28][29][30], mental health [27], and drug treatment status [22,31,32], although not by gender [30,33]. Accuracy has varied in studies of arrestee populations [34,35] but have been reported as higher in groups sampled in emergency department and STI clinics [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TLFB demonstrates good agreement with collateral reports (Dillon et al, 2005) and convergent validity (Vinson et al, 2003). For this study, percentage of heavy drinking days (PHDD) within the month was calculated for each of the months preceding each assessment.…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%