2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000447325.05518.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance Between Hospital Records and Maternal Recall 5–10 Years After Childbirth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our objective is to identify the causal effects of the in-kind incentives on provider performance on outcomes related to the delivery of maternal and child care, as well as on population-level health 22 For the indicators of prenatal care quality and timeliness, medical records were preferred since they were more precise in terms of exact dates and procedures performed. Even though household surveys that rely on maternal recall can be accurate for some specific interventions during delivery (Chen et al, 2014) and for conditions during pregnancy (Krakowiak, 2015), to our knowledge its reliability in terms of specific clinical items during prenatal care is not that well studied. Moreover, differential recall bias related to pregnancy outcomes and women characteristics has long been known to be a concern in the epidemiological literature (Yawn et al 1998).…”
Section: A Identification and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective is to identify the causal effects of the in-kind incentives on provider performance on outcomes related to the delivery of maternal and child care, as well as on population-level health 22 For the indicators of prenatal care quality and timeliness, medical records were preferred since they were more precise in terms of exact dates and procedures performed. Even though household surveys that rely on maternal recall can be accurate for some specific interventions during delivery (Chen et al, 2014) and for conditions during pregnancy (Krakowiak, 2015), to our knowledge its reliability in terms of specific clinical items during prenatal care is not that well studied. Moreover, differential recall bias related to pregnancy outcomes and women characteristics has long been known to be a concern in the epidemiological literature (Yawn et al 1998).…”
Section: A Identification and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%