2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance for neuroblastoma in monozygotic twins: case report and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] Previous aCGH analysis of NBL in a set of monozygotic twins revealed few differences between the primary adrenal versus liver tumours, supporting metastatic spread. 2 In our report, similar CNVs between both twin tumour samples also strongly support a common clonal origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10][11][12] Previous aCGH analysis of NBL in a set of monozygotic twins revealed few differences between the primary adrenal versus liver tumours, supporting metastatic spread. 2 In our report, similar CNVs between both twin tumour samples also strongly support a common clonal origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Concordant or discordant occurrence of NBL in monozygotic twins has been described in the literature. 1,2 Fetoplacental metastasis has been postulated as a mechanism to account for concordant cases where one twin develops a primary adrenal tumour and the second twin manifests the disease without an identifiable primary site. 1,2 However, those tumours may originate and arise concomitantly due to the same genetic background shared by monozygotic twins, suggesting a predisposition to develop NBL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WGD was also observed in all samples of this twin pair. Previous studies have proposed an in utero twin-to-twin metastasis model for cancer development in monozygotic twins [ 30 , 31 ]. Our results provide further evidence supporting this model, as twin pair 1 shared mutations in SP4 (p.Thr728Thr) and ZNF304 (p.Glu228lys), and twin pair 2 shared mutations in EMR1 (p.Pro302Arg), SEMA6C (p.Leu348Arg) and PCDHGA4 (p.Asp536Tyr).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of the two cases is present in Table 1. Fetoplacental metastasis is the favored hypothesis in cases with shared tumor pathology and where one twin has an identifiable primary tumor and the recipient twin manifests the disease without a recognizable primary site [2]. The twins presented in this case report have similar tumor pathologies with slight variation in other characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%