2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76102-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance in detecting amyloid positivity between 18F-florbetaben and 18F-flutemetamol amyloid PET using quantitative and qualitative assessments

Abstract: We aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess whether there is a discrepancy in detecting amyloid beta (Aβ) positivity between 18F-florbetaben (FBB) and 18F-flutemetamol (FMM) positron emission tomography (PET). We obtained paired FBB and FMM PET images from 107 participants. Three experts visually quantified the Aβ deposition as positive or negative. Quantitative assessment was performed using global cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) with the whole cerebellum as the reference region. Inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High agreement rates were found between FBB and FMM in visual assessment (94.4%) and SUVR cut-off categorization (98.1%). In addition, both FBB and FMM showed high agreement rates between visual assessment and SUVR cut-off categorization (93.5% in FBB and 91.6% in FMM) 40 . Fifth, selecting grey matter regions as ROI might have made the comparison between DTI features and others unfair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…High agreement rates were found between FBB and FMM in visual assessment (94.4%) and SUVR cut-off categorization (98.1%). In addition, both FBB and FMM showed high agreement rates between visual assessment and SUVR cut-off categorization (93.5% in FBB and 91.6% in FMM) 40 . Fifth, selecting grey matter regions as ROI might have made the comparison between DTI features and others unfair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Once all outliers are removed from the dataset, 2.5% is added to the SUVR of the highest remaining case, which results in a cutoff value [ 36 ]. As a result, the cortical SUVR cutoff values were 1.1 for FBB and 1.03 for FMM, respectively, when the whole cerebellum was used as a reference region [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this might be mitigated to some extent in that visual assessment by experienced doctors has shown high agreement with SUVR cut-off optimization method. 32 Regardless of the abovementioned limitations, the current study is noteworthy as this is the first study to demonstrate that increased 18 F-THK5351 uptake can predict cognitive decline among Aβ– aMCI patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%