1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00090-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
192
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, reliability for most cannabis dependence criteria were fair, similar to that observed in other studies (Compton et al, 1996;Cottler et al, 1997;Miele et al, 2000;Bucholz et al, 1995). These findings complement the growing body of literature supporting the existence of the cannabis dependence syndrome and cannabis withdrawal, as well as the validity of the DSM IV dependence criteria as they apply to cannabis dependence (Budney, 2006;Budney and Hughes, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, reliability for most cannabis dependence criteria were fair, similar to that observed in other studies (Compton et al, 1996;Cottler et al, 1997;Miele et al, 2000;Bucholz et al, 1995). These findings complement the growing body of literature supporting the existence of the cannabis dependence syndrome and cannabis withdrawal, as well as the validity of the DSM IV dependence criteria as they apply to cannabis dependence (Budney, 2006;Budney and Hughes, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The good to excellent (k = 0.70–0.91) test–retest reliability of AUDADIS-IV substance use disorder diagnoses is documented in clinical and general population samples 37-39, 44-46 . Convergent, discriminant and construct validity of AUDADIS-IV substance use disorder criteria and diagnoses were good to excellent 47-51 , including international studies 52-57 , and agreement with clinical reappraisals 44, 52 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As reported in detail elsewhere, the reliability and validity were good to excellent for alcohol use disorder diagnoses (Muthén et al 1993;Grant et al 1995Grant et al , 2003Grant et al , 2004Chatterji et al 1997;Cottler et al 1997;Hasin et al 1997;2003;Pull et al 1997;Ustun et al 1997;Canino et al 1999;Hasin and Paykin, 1999;Nelson et al 1999;Compton et al 2004). Reliability ) and validity for alcohol abuse and dependence criteria were fair to good as assessed in clinical reappraisal studies conducted by psychiatrists using a semi-structured diagnostic interview.…”
Section: Dsm-iv Alcohol Abuse and Dependence Criteriamentioning
confidence: 80%