2012
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2011.0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance of HIV Type 1 Tropism Phenotype to Predictions Using Web-Based Analysis of V3 Sequences: Composite Algorithms May Be Needed to Properly Assess Viral Tropism

Abstract: Genotypic prediction of HIV-1 tropism has been considered a practical surrogate for phenotypic tests and recently an European Consensus has set up recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Twenty-five antiretroviral-experienced patients, all heavily treated cases with a median of 16 years of antiretroviral therapy, had viral tropism determined by the Trofile assay and predicted by HIV-1 sequencing of partial env, followed by interpretation using web-based tools. Trofile determined 17/24 (71%) as X4 tro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geno2Pheno[coreceptor FPR:10-20%], [8] and WebPSSM X4R5 [10] were highly concordant 88% (95%CI 79%-90%), in line with previous studies which demonstrated the best concordance (>85%) between these 2 algorithms. [32][33][34] There was poor agreement among the WebPSSM matrixes: X4R5, SINSI, and SINSI C at 52% due to overestimation of CXCR4 coreceptor usage by WebPSSM SINSI_C which was trained on subtype C which were under-represented in this study. [35] The global distribution and genetic complexity of HIV-1 subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) have continued to evolve, exhibiting altered transmissibility, cellular tropism, kinetics of viral replication, and disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Geno2Pheno[coreceptor FPR:10-20%], [8] and WebPSSM X4R5 [10] were highly concordant 88% (95%CI 79%-90%), in line with previous studies which demonstrated the best concordance (>85%) between these 2 algorithms. [32][33][34] There was poor agreement among the WebPSSM matrixes: X4R5, SINSI, and SINSI C at 52% due to overestimation of CXCR4 coreceptor usage by WebPSSM SINSI_C which was trained on subtype C which were under-represented in this study. [35] The global distribution and genetic complexity of HIV-1 subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) have continued to evolve, exhibiting altered transmissibility, cellular tropism, kinetics of viral replication, and disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although overestimation can occur with use of a single algorithm , a combination of Geno2Pheno (false positive rate = 5%) and PSMM reportedly improves specificity . In the future, confirmation by phenotypic assays needs to be developed; this would further incorporate intermediate transitional dual/mixed‐tropic (CXCR4 and/or CCR5) virus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this is the main reason for a certain inherent limitation of any genotypic prediction of an HIV tropism. Nevertheless, clinical comparisons have clearly demonstrated that for the vast majority of cases, genotyping and phenotypic methods are in quite good agreement, particularly for R5-tropic virus (25,42). In an HTA approach, the degree of matching between patient-derived virus and the known sequence probes defines discrete migration zones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent complexity of the subject is exemplified in a recent publication by Cabral et al, who compared genotypic methods with Trofile as the phenotypic standard and concluded that "composite algorithms may be needed" for predictively assessing the viral tropism when only V3 sequences are analyzed (25). Comparative studies of the commercial genotypic test with the validated Trofile assay found the SensiTrop test to be inferior in identifying CXCR4 tropism in clinical specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%