2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete compressive strength prediction using non-destructive tests through response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To build up a precise prediction model, a large number of experimental data on normal-weight concrete compressive strength, UPV test results, and rebound number from rebound hammer tests is required. We 6 have collected 516 data points of the compressive strength of concrete, which were tested at 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 90 days [9,10,13,15,17,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To build up a precise prediction model, a large number of experimental data on normal-weight concrete compressive strength, UPV test results, and rebound number from rebound hammer tests is required. We 6 have collected 516 data points of the compressive strength of concrete, which were tested at 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 90 days [9,10,13,15,17,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDTs are widely used to evaluate the fundamental characteristics of concrete in structures, such as compressive strength. NDTs do not cause any damage to the structure and do not affect the structural performance [10]. Many different types of NDTs have been developed in order to measure the compressive strength of concrete, among them the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and rebound hammer (RH) tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, simple linear regression with scatter plot is commonly adopted [ 9 ]. However, more advanced DoE, such as Response Surface [ 10 ], and even machine learning [ 11 ], have been successful in producing a more accurate prediction. For studies related to replacement of concrete materials [ 12 , 13 ], DoE approaches are highly favourable with a significant number of recent studies adopting more advanced methodology to analyse experimental data [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali-Benyahia et al [21] performed a study that examines models between DT and NDT in combination or individual (Rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity). The results of the studies showed that combining destructive and non-destructive tests to estimate the concrete strength are highly recommended and give more accurate results leading to an increase in the quality of tests [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%