2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete evidence & geographically weighted regression: A regional analysis of wealth and the land cover in Massachusetts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tool calculates a statistic (e.g. minimum, mean, sum, and standard deviation) for each individual zonal spatial feature, such as a UCI polygon, based on values from another raster dataset (LST in this case) (Sommer & Wade, 2006;Ogneva-Himmelberger et al, 2009). There are 153 UCIs used for the following analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Identification Of Uci and Its Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool calculates a statistic (e.g. minimum, mean, sum, and standard deviation) for each individual zonal spatial feature, such as a UCI polygon, based on values from another raster dataset (LST in this case) (Sommer & Wade, 2006;Ogneva-Himmelberger et al, 2009). There are 153 UCIs used for the following analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Identification Of Uci and Its Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle spatial heterogeneity, geographically weighted regression (GWR) is regularly used through locally estimating coefficients, rendering a contextual layer of coefficient estimates that vary over space. Examples of GWR span many fields, such as ecology, wealth and epidemics (Platt 2004, Ognev-Himmelberger et al 2009, Atkinson et al 2003, and Nagaya et al 2010, traffic count and crash count predictions across road networks (Zhao and Park 2004;Hadayeghi et al 2009), and land use (Páez 2006;Wang et al 2011). …”
Section: Motivations For Spatial Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…GWR is prone to spatial autocorrelation among variables and is an increasingly popular method of analyzing spatially dependent relationships in urban geographic analyses [34,35]. This study employed GWR to identify the spatial relationships between UGS and the degree of urban compaction within the study area.…”
Section: Geographically-weighted Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%