Concrete Experiences and Support Needs Regarding the Euthanasia Practice in Adults With Psychiatric Conditions: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals and Volunteers in Belgium

Abstract

ObjectiveAlthough euthanasia in the context of adult psychiatry is legalized in Belgium, it poses major ethical and clinical challenges for the health care professionals and volunteers involved. This study aimed to address these members' concrete experiences and support needs.MethodsA qualitative semi-structured interview study was conducted with 16 physicians and 14 other health care professionals and volunteers, with at least one concrete experience with euthanasia requests and procedures concerning adults with psychiatric conditions.FindingsConcrete experiences concerned the following 8 domains: (1) the impact of euthanasia on the clinical trajectory and (2) on the therapeutic relationship, (3) internal and (4) external collaborative partnerships, (5) patients' social inner circle (non-)involvement, (6) the use of recently published guidelines and, (7) the first criminal trials on this topic, and (8) the act of euthanasia. The following 8 main support needs emerged; (1) protocols addressing specific sub-populations and pathologies, (2) protocols specifically drawn up for non-medics, (3) guidance on how to adequately implement the two-track approach, (4) (after)care for patients, (5) (after)care for the health care team, (6) guidance on the patient's social inner circle involvement, (7) enhanced education measures, and (8) enhanced financial measures, including incentives for holistic, palliative care approaches.ConclusionThe health care professionals and volunteers reported many positive and negative experiences in dealing with euthanasia requests in adult psychiatry. They reported several support needs across the extensive euthanasia trajectory, pertaining to concrete management of thorny issues that guidelines do not (yet) touch on. Important implications of our study relate to tackling these existing issues, and to paying sufficient attention to the impact of a euthanasia trajectory on all actors, including the patients and their social inner circle, involved.

Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review

“…The literature is replete with questions to address in relation to MAiD-MD, including the feeling of being a burden [ 20 , 69 ]; safeguards to implement or avoid [ 30 , 56 , 69 ]; factors reducing the voluntariness of MAiD-MD requests [ 46 ]; the relevance of adopting a more holistic consideration of certain eligibility criteria, by better considering the quality of life and the needs of patients [ 48 ]; the importance of developing resources oriented towards aid in living, etc. A need for training [ 78 ], awareness-raising [ 27 ], and guidelines [ 78 ] is apparent, as well as a need to develop more support resources to help all stakeholders through the challenging situations and discussions that can arise in the context of MAiD-MD [ 64 , 70 , 84 ].…”

Implementation of Assisted Dying in Catalonia: Impact on Professionals and Development of Good Practices. Protocol for a Qualitative Study

“…Accordingly, Timoty Quill studied the limits professionals set when it comes to meeting patients’ perceived needs, as well as their moral compass (Quill, 2018), given the deep displacement of values (Beuthin et al, 2018; Dholakia et al, 2022; Lavoie et al, 2015; Stevens, 2006). One qualitative study shows the difficulty that Dutch doctors experience when they go from being seen as caregivers involved in the patient’s health to simple interpreters of the law, facing requests for euthanasia based on non-medical reasons (Snijdewind et al, 2018), such as mental health issues (Evenblij et al, 2019; Pronk et al, 2021; Verhofstadt et al, 2022) or when the patient is not competent at the time of the request (Kouwenhoven et al, 2015; Variath et al, 2022). 3.…”